[Fwd: Re: [Fwd: Re: [Mono-devel-list] System.Data.DataSet.ReadXml reimplementation]]

Atsushi Eno atsushi at ximian.com
Fri Jun 24 02:15:16 EDT 2005

Hi Kosta,

Maybe I had better take care of it by myself. I think there are
some cases that we can optimize. For example when tables are already
defined it does not require InferSchema and thus entire load won't
be required. However similar things also happen to XmlDataReader,
so they should be taken care as a whole. Please feel free to
commit this patch but I'll look into them at some stage again.

Atsushi Eno

Konstantin Triger wrote:
> Hi Eno,
> I don't see it in mailing list so resending.
> I made the changes we talked about, bt it turns out they probably won't 
> make a big diff (see attached patch)
> The problem is that I have to collect almost always:
> XmlReadMode.InferSchema: in order to be able to skip if "schema" is found.
> XmlReadMode.Auto: as I don't know what's gonna be.
> XmlReadMode.DiffGram: wait for diffgram - very uncommon case, but have a 
> test (MonoTests.System.Data.DataSetTest.ReadWriteXmlDiffGram).
> XmlReadMode.IgnoreSchema: to be able to ignore the schema if it's found.
>  From the other side in most cases the schema or diffgram element will 
> be as root or its child, so nothing would be collected anyway.
> Regards,
> Konstantin Triger

More information about the Mono-devel-list mailing list