[Mono-devel-list] Re: W3C xmlconf test status

[Ilya Kharmatsky]

 >> Just to make sure: "GH" is "GrassHopper", right?

;-) absolutely.

Atsushi Eno wrote:

> Hi again,
>
> I think there are some patches that are rejected because they
> resulted in regressions. That's why such inconsistency has
> happened. I cannot call them "regressions".
>
> (Just to make sure: "GH" is "GrassHopper", right? Maybe many of
> the readers don't understand what it is.)
>
> Atsushi Eno
>
> Andrew Skiba wrote:
>
>> Hi again.
>>
>> I think my mission with W3C testsuite is done. Few thinks that can be 
>> improved I listed in TODO file, but the suite can be used already.
>>
>> I ran this suite against the last GH System.Xml and Mono, and there 
>> were 10 fixes and 62 regressions. I devided all tests that fail on 
>> mono into 2 groups - those that fail on also on GH I put to 
>> knownFailures.lst, and those specific to mono are listed in 
>> fixme.lst. We need to understand those regressions before we can use 
>> SVN instead of our current code.
>>
>> Next thing, I will make XSLT testsuite to provide the similar 
>> information.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Andrew.
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Mono-devel-list mailing list
> Mono-devel-list at lists.ximian.com
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
>