[Mono-devel-list] Re: W3C xmlconf test status

[Atsushi Eno]

Hi again,

I think there are some patches that are rejected because they
resulted in regressions. That's why such inconsistency has
happened. I cannot call them "regressions".

(Just to make sure: "GH" is "GrassHopper", right? Maybe many of
the readers don't understand what it is.)

Atsushi Eno

Andrew Skiba wrote:
> Hi again.
> 
> I think my mission with W3C testsuite is done. Few thinks that can be 
> improved I listed in TODO file, but the suite can be used already.
> 
> I ran this suite against the last GH System.Xml and Mono, and there were 
> 10 fixes and 62 regressions. I devided all tests that fail on mono into 
> 2 groups - those that fail on also on GH I put to knownFailures.lst, and 
> those specific to mono are listed in fixme.lst. We need to understand 
> those regressions before we can use SVN instead of our current code.
> 
> Next thing, I will make XSLT testsuite to provide the similar information.
> 
> Regards,
> Andrew.
>