[Mono-devel-list] ByteFX development
tberman at off.net
Fri Sep 17 16:32:21 EDT 2004
On Fri, 2004-09-17 at 15:59 -0400, Chris Morgan wrote:
> Having just Mono.Data.MySQL seems much simpler and less confusing from an end-users perspective. Because it is an integrated mono component it instills confidence that it won't go unsupported. I guess I just think it will be better for mono and its users in the long run.
How about instead of emailing for 3 or 4 days about this, you work on
supporting the code in its current name, and then when the code is
*actually* supported there can be talk of moving it....
What happens if you move it now, and then it ends up being unsupported
still, all of a sudden you end up with people having broken code, and
with nothing to gain out of it.
More information about the Mono-devel-list