[Mono-devel-list] macosx beta2 binary

Attila Balogh d0lphin at mail.edu-net.hu
Wed Jun 9 21:40:25 EDT 2004

regarding this:
today i was trying to build an .mpgk for gtk# (0.93) with darwinports, 
didn't succeed, but i could create .mpkg-s for the main gtk# 
dependencies (mono, libgnomeui, libgtkhtml3, vte, etc), plus a .pkg for 
they need some testing though, i will post them around weekend.


On Jun 10, 2004, at 3:06 AM, Urs Muff wrote:

> The binary distribution does not include gtk# and is self contained 
> and does
> not refer to anything outside itself.
> If you have gtk# installed you did that on your own and has nothing to 
> do
> with the binary distribution, you most likely have more then one mono
> install then, which might explain some of your problems.
> There are some well known gtk# issues, just look @ miguel's blog how 
> he got
> MonoDevelop to run...
> Gtk# is such a dependency beast (about 200 very complex ones) that 
> only few
> hackers dared to tackle them; and none succeeded to make a binary self
> contained Mac compliant package installer for gtk#.
> Btw: I was the first hacker that got MonoDevelop to run on the Mac and 
> am
> very aware of all your pains, but right now solving them of all Mac 
> users is
> out of my control, sorry.
> But reporting bugs and issues you have with the Mac distribution here 
> is the
> right thing to do, just one note having constructive report including 
> ways
> you want it fixed is the best way to go.
> - Urs
> -----Original Message-----
> From: wiking [mailto:wiking at huwico.hu]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2004 5:36 PM
> To: Urs Muff
> Cc: mono-devel-list at lists.ximian.com
> Subject: Re: [Mono-devel-list] macosx beta2 binary
> hmm well i was playing with a bit, now i can run gtk# samples, but as
> you can see from the "howto" there's a lot to change/fix
> http://wiking.jol.hu/blog/2004/06/10#mono2
> any comments/ideas? (fe.: which .dylibs should be removed from
> /opt/local/lib)
> wiking
> On Jun 10, 2004, at 1:07 AM, Urs Muff wrote:
>> Well a binary distribution has nothing to a fink or darwinport one,
>> and is
>> intended for someone who has no prior installation.  I will definitely
>> not
>> uninstall anything you already have installed.
>> All the libraries and dependencies are local to the Mono framework,
>> there
>> are just some symbolic links in /usr/bin that point to the framework.
>> You can remove it by removing /Library/Framework/Mono.framework and
>> all the
>> symbolic links in /usr/bin that point in there.
>> Darwinport and fink distributions are more intended for developers or
>> people
>> that know what they are doing.
>> - Urs
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: mono-devel-list-admin at lists.ximian.com
>> [mailto:mono-devel-list-admin at lists.ximian.com] On Behalf Of wiking
>> Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2004 3:16 PM
>> To: mono-devel-list at lists.ximian.com
>> Subject: [Mono-devel-list] macosx beta2 binary
>> hi
>> ::: well after installing mono beta 2 binary on my macosx i've just
>> realized that it totally has f***d up the structure (paths etc) that 
>> it
>> had in beta1 binary - the darwinports like binary way, because of this
>> it seems that i have to recompile everything because of
>> cross-references... any ideas maybe to avoid this - or a way to simply
>> remove whole beta2? :(
>> just cannot understand why did you have to change all this....
>> regards
>> wiking
>> _______________________________________________
>> Mono-devel-list mailing list
>> Mono-devel-list at lists.ximian.com
>> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
> _______________________________________________
> Mono-devel-list mailing list
> Mono-devel-list at lists.ximian.com
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list

More information about the Mono-devel-list mailing list