[Mono-devel-list] Patch for full-featured mcs /doc support
Atsushi Eno
atsushi at ximian.com
Wed Dec 1 15:09:24 EST 2004
Hi,
> There seems to be an issue with doc comments on Interface members. The
> following code :
<snip>
Oh, yes, I forgot to consume doc comments on most of interface
member declarations except for indexers. Thanks!
Now I attached a new patch. Not a few but small changes:
- Fixed the interface member comments in cs-parser.jay
as Ian pointed out.
- It turned out that I missed to support partial types.
Added some lines in doc.cs.
- Martin pointed out that I need to add some (C) lines.
- Reverted public TypeContainer.default_static_constructor
to protected. Added DefaultStaticConstructor property.
- I modified cs-tokenizer.cs and doc.cs (GetDocCommentNode())
so that xml comment won't mix CRLF and LF.
- removed xml_documentation_file field and TypeContainer
parameter to OutputDocument() as Miguel suggested.
One thing I am wondering is how to remove this away... :
> Property changes on: doc.cs
> ___________________________________________________________________
> Name: svn:executable
> + *
Atsushi Eno
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: xml-028.cs
Url: http://lists.ximian.com/pipermail/mono-devel-list/attachments/20041202/a69e5088/attachment.pl
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: xml-029.cs
Url: http://lists.ximian.com/pipermail/mono-devel-list/attachments/20041202/a69e5088/attachment-0001.pl
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: mcs-doc-20041202.diff
Url: http://lists.ximian.com/pipermail/mono-devel-list/attachments/20041202/a69e5088/attachment-0002.pl
More information about the Mono-devel-list
mailing list