[Mono-devel-list] Surveys: Mono 1.0 and Mono Conference.
Ravi Pratap M
ravi at ximian.com
Wed Oct 8 23:54:06 EDT 2003
On Wed, 2003-10-08 at 21:24, Miguel de Icaza wrote:
> Mono 1.0 so far is going to be a subset, and my current thinking
> is `.NET 1.0 minus two major pieces: EnterpriseServices and
> But today some people suggested that we might want to have a
> Mono 1.0 release earlier by committing to less than that,
> something like:
While it seems tempting, when we are so close to having most bits
complete, to wait for those bits to be done and then have a release, I
sincerely feel that Mono has been in development for more than 2 years
now and a 1.0 release should really be on time-based priority.
I would say, let us evaluate what bits we can provide and set those as
our goals and get into bugfixing mode. Subsequently, following the GNOME
model, we can do a 1.2, 1.4 every 6 months to keep pumping improvements
out to the community.
> Mono 1.0:
> C# compiler
> Toolchain (ilasm, ildasm, al, etc)
> corlib, System, System.XML, System.Security.
> ADO.NET (System.Data and providers)
> ASP.NET (System.Web.Services and System.Web)
> Anything else that is robust by the time the other components
> are deemed "stable" would also make it. So if for example
> "System.Wasabinator" is of 1.0 quality by the time the rest is
> done, we can also include it.
Sounds like a plan.
> We can certainly make this a hacker-only conference, but
> given the amount of projects, companies and developers
> using Mono, it might make sense to have something with a
> larger scope.
I would say that given the amount of interest in Mono from companies,
certainly a more professional conference is a good idea. At the same
time, it must retain the hacker spirit to be a great springboard for
launching more ideas :-)
> * Barcelona, Spain
I vote for Europe :-)
More information about the Mono-devel-list