[Mono-devel-list] Version moniker for Mono Release
Miguel de Icaza
miguel at ximian.com
Fri Nov 7 13:10:49 EST 2003
> >From an outsiders perspective (me) who is primarily a windows .net
> developer, I agree that mono 1.0 should correspond to .net 1.0, 1.1 to
> 1.1, etc for compatibility (and marketing) reasons.
> Will a .90 Release just not cut it? And for that matter 1.09, etc?
Well, the problem of using the .NET versioning numbers for our
products, is that we are tied to their versions.
So major upgrades to Mono would be Mono 1.1.1 instead of a Mono 2.0 to
Am at this point convinced that Mono needs to follow its own version
scheme, and that we should identify on each release what APIs are
More information about the Mono-devel-list