[Mono-bugs] [Bug 82099][Nor] Changed - Whitespace not rejected if there's no content model
bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.ximian.com
bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.ximian.com
Tue Jul 17 00:27:23 EDT 2007
Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.
Changed by atsushi at ximian.com.
http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=82099
--- shadow/82099 2007-07-14 02:48:30.000000000 -0400
+++ shadow/82099.tmp.27173 2007-07-17 00:27:23.000000000 -0400
@@ -1,14 +1,14 @@
Bug#: 82099
Product: Mono: Class Libraries
Version: 1.2
OS: All
OS Details:
-Status: NEW
-Resolution:
-Severity:
+Status: RESOLVED
+Resolution: NOTABUG
+Severity: Unknown
Priority: Normal
Component: Sys.XML
AssignedTo: atsushi at ximian.com
ReportedBy: gert.driesen at pandora.be
QAContact: mono-bugs at ximian.com
TargetMilestone: ---
@@ -31,6 +31,20 @@
No console output. Exit code is 1.
------- Additional Comments From gert.driesen at pandora.be 2007-07-14 02:48 -------
Created an attachment (id=19561)
Repro
+
+------- Additional Comments From atsushi at ximian.com 2007-07-17 00:27 -------
+To my understanding it contradicts bug #77241 (or
+XsdValidatingReaderTests.EmptyContentAllowWhitespace() as a test
+case). When we take whitespaces considered in validation (I am rather
+tempted to think this is *more* correct though), we/.net must fail for
+the #77241 case.
+
+So, to my understanding, the validation is ambiguously implemented in
+.NET. Based on the fact, I chose "harmless" direction i.e. do not
+reject possibly valid documents, than allowing possibly invalid documents.
+
+Unless there is misunderstanding or other reasons to fix this issue, I
+won't do anything.
More information about the mono-bugs
mailing list