[Mono-bugs] [Bug 79023][Wis] New - Type.InvokeMember does not accept (BindingFlags.SetField | BindingFlags.SetProperty)

bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.ximian.com bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.ximian.com
Sun Aug 6 22:21:47 EDT 2006


Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

Changed by rodrigobamboo at gmail.com.

http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=79023

--- shadow/79023	2006-08-06 22:21:47.000000000 -0400
+++ shadow/79023.tmp.1186	2006-08-06 22:21:47.000000000 -0400
@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
+Bug#: 79023
+Product: Mono: Class Libraries
+Version: 1.1
+OS: 
+OS Details: 
+Status: NEW   
+Resolution: 
+Severity: 
+Priority: Wishlist
+Component: CORLIB
+AssignedTo: mono-bugs at ximian.com                            
+ReportedBy: rodrigobamboo at gmail.com               
+QAContact: mono-bugs at ximian.com
+TargetMilestone: ---
+URL: 
+Cc: 
+Summary: Type.InvokeMember does not accept (BindingFlags.SetField | BindingFlags.SetProperty)
+
+The MS.NET implementation has no problem with both flags being specified
+together, it means either SetField if the member is a field or SetProperty
+if it is a property.
+
+using System;
+using System.Collections;
+using System.Reflection;
+
+public class Program
+{
+	public static void Main(string[] args)
+	{
+		ArrayList list = new ArrayList();
+		list.Add("foo");
+		list.GetType().InvokeMember(			
+			"Item",
+		
+BindingFlags.SetField|BindingFlags.SetProperty|BindingFlags.Instance|BindingFlags.Public,
+			null,
+			list,
+			new object[] { 0, "bar" });
+		if (!object.Equals("bar", list[0]))
+		{
+			throw new ApplicationException();
+		}
+	}
+}


More information about the mono-bugs mailing list