[Gtk-sharp-list] Shadow vs ShadowType

Lee Mallabone gnome@fonicmonkey.net
12 Mar 2003 08:34:26 +0000

On Wed, 2003-03-12 at 04:42, Mike Kestner wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-03-11 at 15:59, Lee Mallabone wrote:
> > I suspect this is for legacy reasons in Gtk+. I think it would be great
> > to offer improved consistency throughout Gtk# and only expose the
> > 'Shadow' property.
> > 
> > Is this easy to do? Does anyone disagree as to whether it should be
> > done?
> No, but for purposes of code generation, we should pick the prop name
> that coincides with any get/set methods, in this case shadow-type.  We
> can just hide the shadow prop with metadata.

On a class by class basis, you mean?

Which name we pick isn't of any real consequence, I just thought the
'type' in 'shadow-type' was a tad redundant...