[Gtk-sharp-list] My monthly status update

mkestner@speakeasy.net mkestner@speakeasy.net
Mon, 11 Feb 2002 09:35:31 -0800

On 00 Feb 2002, Miguel de Icaza wrote:

> This is a shame, because I think the binary
> file would have been good enough, and would
> reduce the number of dependencies to get
> things rolling.

I tried the cvs admin -kb, and even a complete remove/add -kb, and cvs diff kept cranking out the entire 652K file in the diff output.  I agree that I would like to keep it in CVS for now, but I don't want to produce that kind of traffic on mono-patches since the xml is still fairly dynamic.  If anyone else has any better ideas, I'm all ears.