[Glade-devel] Why libxml2 and not GMarkupParser?

[bighead@users.sourceforge.net]

libxml2 can handle gzipped XML!

w0w + nice :D

Archit

Olexiy Avramchenko <olexiy@irtech.cn.ua> writes:

> Tim M=C3=BCller wrote:
>=20
> >Hi list,
> >
> >Just out of curiosity: why does libglade2 depend on libxml2?
> >
> > I admit I am somewhat ignorant about the internals of libglade2, but
> > at first glance I could not find anything that could not also be
> > done with GMarkupParser, which is part of GLib. Or am I missing
> > something here?
> >
> > Admittedly GMarkupParser is not quite as refined as libxml2 -
> > especially in the error handling -, but then: if the .glade file is
> > faulty, you're in trouble anyway. The .glade XML files don't seem to
> > use things like namespaces or non-standard entities either, so
> > GMarkupParser should be able to handle them just fine, at least as
> > far as I can see.
> >
> > libxml2 is 924 kB of size on my system. I think getting rid of this
> > particular dependency would be quite nice. Of course it doesn't make
> > much difference for full-fledged GNOME apps, but for Gtk+-only
> > applications it seems a worthwhile optimisation, and might make
> > libglade more attractive for applications that are designed to run
> > also in memory-restricted environments (e.g. embedded systems etc.).
> > Getting rid of libxml2 should decrease application start-up time as
> > well (although I am not sure how relevant this is on modern desktop
> > systems).
> >
> >Any thoughts on this?
> >
> As for size issues: I'm afraid that Glib's markup stuff doesn't handle
> compressed xml files,
> like libxml2 does. For example: I have ~600KB xml for my current
> project, gzipped it's about ~36KB.
>=20
>     Olexiy
>=20
> _______________________________________________
> Glade-devel maillist  -  Glade-devel@lists.ximian.com
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/glade-devel