[MonoTouch] Dependency Injection for monotuch

[Adam Langley]

Thanks Håvard, 
I wasn't aware of that one.
I have since tried PicoContainer, and that one works.
I'll be taking a look at Funq as I would like generics support...

Adam Langley

 Please consider the environment before printing this email!


-----Original Message-----
From: monotouch-bounces at lists.ximian.com [mailto:monotouch-bounces at lists.ximian.com] On Behalf Of Håvard Stranden
Sent: Friday, 2 October 2009 11:32 a.m.
To: monotouch at lists.ximian.com
Subject: Re: [MonoTouch] Dependency Injection for monotuch

Tried Funq? It is an expression based DI container (no runtime
reflection), and was created for the mobile application blocks. Check
out http://funq.codeplex.com/.

-- 
Håvard Stranden



On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 12:18 AM, Adam Langley <alangley at winscribe.com> wrote:
> I have been researching which DI frameworks work with monotouch.
> I have found that pretty much none of the ones I tried do.
>
> I have tried:
> Windsor
> AutoFac
> Ninject
> StructureMap
> Spring.Net
>
> Going to attempt PicoContainer today...
>
> And I have used .net 2.0 versions (trying to avoid 3.5 references) where
> possible.
> Anything that uses Linfu Reflection.Emit will fail, and several of these
> containers have references to System.Web.dll which isn't available on
> monotouch so they become useless too.
>
> I have started to roll my own, I really would prefer to use Windsor as
> Im so used to it - has anyone else gotten any of these to work with
> monotouch?
>
> Thanks
>
> Adam Langley
> _______________________________________________
> MonoTouch mailing list
> MonoTouch at lists.ximian.com
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/monotouch
>
_______________________________________________
MonoTouch mailing list
MonoTouch at lists.ximian.com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/monotouch