[mono-android] JAR Bindings parameter names
Jeremy A. Kolb - ARA/NED
jkolb at ara.com
Fri Oct 12 12:54:46 UTC 2012
Are you sure? I generated docs using Javadoc and passed them in JavaDocPaths. That did not work.
Then I regenerated the bindings using doclava and passed them as JavaDocPaths and it sort of worked (some of the method names changed but I don't see any of the comments).
Jeremy
-----Original Message-----
From: monodroid-bounces at lists.ximian.com [mailto:monodroid-bounces at lists.ximian.com] On Behalf Of Atsushi Eno
Sent: Friday, October 12, 2012 4:30 AM
To: Discussions related to Mono for Android
Subject: Re: [mono-android] JAR Bindings parameter names
Actually javadocs in droiddoc format has to be passed as DroidDocPaths property, not JavaDocPaths property which is to parse HTML in default javadoc format (I believe this is the default, and consistent, but there is no assurance that java sdk doesn't change the format).
Atsushi Eno
Jonathan Pryor wrote:
> On Oct 11, 2012, at 9:20 AM, Jeremy A. Kolb - ARA/NED <jkolb at ara.com> wrote:
>> So I can see that the javadocpath is being populated put nothing api.xml doesn't change and I don't get any parameter names or comments.
> The current javadoc parser is not "robust;" it's "good enough" to parse Google's javadoc documentation (for processing android.jar), but there many javadoc formats, not all of which are supported. For example, the Google Maps javadoc format differs from the android.jar javadoc format, and the Google Maps javadocs cannot be imported at this time.
>
> I'm sorry for the inconvenience.
>
> - Jon
>
> _______________________________________________
> Monodroid mailing list
> Monodroid at lists.ximian.com
>
> UNSUBSCRIBE INFORMATION:
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/monodroid
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Monodroid mailing list
Monodroid at lists.ximian.com
UNSUBSCRIBE INFORMATION:
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/monodroid
More information about the Monodroid
mailing list