[MonoDevelop] Formatting method calls

Mike Krüger mkrueger at xamarin.com
Tue Oct 15 14:19:22 UTC 2013


Hi

You should set the same in method call & declaration otherwise it only 
works when formatting code - not while typing.
And set it in the project options - otherwise it only works for new 
projects.

Regards
Mike
> Mike,
>
> Seems like that Wrapping parameter, "Align to first parameter" is 
> being ignored or is not working.
>
> Matt
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 9:59 AM, Mike Krüger <mkrueger at xamarin.com 
> <mailto:mkrueger at xamarin.com>> wrote:
>
>     Hi
>
>     Ok then it should be no problem to switch between different styles
>     in the c# formatting 'Wrapping' category.
>
>     Regards
>     Mike
>
>>     Mike,
>>
>>     I am on a pretty recent build:
>>
>>     MonoDevelop
>>     Version 4.1.7
>>     Installation UUID: feaee481-7c2a-4781-a090-d6228809132d
>>     Runtime:
>>         Mono 3.2.3 (master/bb2bc9a Sun Sep 15 07:17:46 EDT 2013) (64-bit)
>>         GTK+ 2.24.10 theme: Ambiance
>>         GTK# (2.12.0.0)
>>
>>     Build Information
>>     Git revision: b163744f48206beeb7853c03d636c30a6619d988
>>     Build date: 2013-10-03 12:28:26+0000
>>
>>     Operating System
>>     Linux
>>     Linux pharos 3.2.0-54-generic #82-Ubuntu SMP Tue Sep 10 20:08:42
>>     UTC 2013 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>>
>>
>>
>>     It seems to me that the "change" in the default occurred recently
>>     (say within the past two months). Is there a formatting parameter
>>     to control this?
>>
>>     Matt
>>
>>
>>
>>     On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 9:52 AM, Mike Krüger
>>     <mkrueger at xamarin.com <mailto:mkrueger at xamarin.com>> wrote:
>>
>>         Hi
>>
>>         MD should support both styles - depending on where arg1 is
>>         placed.
>>
>>         btw. which version are you using (the master version is much
>>         better in formatting/indentation than any released version).
>>
>>         Regards
>>         Mike
>>>         I don't see how in the code formatting preferences to
>>>         control the following. When one has a method with a lot of
>>>         arguments and they are spread across multiple lines they
>>>         used to format as:
>>>
>>>         MethodBeingCalled(arg1,
>>>         arg2,
>>>         arg3);
>>>
>>>         But now MD wants to do:
>>>
>>>         MethodBeingCalled(
>>>            arg1,
>>>            arg2,
>>>            arg3);
>>>
>>>
>>>         I am agnostic on which is better, but our code was mostly
>>>         written in the first style and now I find MD wanting to use
>>>         the second style. I can't see which formatting refers to
>>>         this indentation difference, is there one?
>>>
>>>         Matt
>>>
>>>
>>>         _______________________________________________
>>>         Monodevelop-list mailing list
>>>         Monodevelop-list at lists.ximian.com  <mailto:Monodevelop-list at lists.ximian.com>
>>>         http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/monodevelop-list
>>
>>
>>         _______________________________________________
>>         Monodevelop-list mailing list
>>         Monodevelop-list at lists.ximian.com
>>         <mailto:Monodevelop-list at lists.ximian.com>
>>         http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/monodevelop-list
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     Monodevelop-list mailing list
>>     Monodevelop-list at lists.ximian.com  <mailto:Monodevelop-list at lists.ximian.com>
>>     http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/monodevelop-list
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Monodevelop-list mailing list
>     Monodevelop-list at lists.ximian.com
>     <mailto:Monodevelop-list at lists.ximian.com>
>     http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/monodevelop-list
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Monodevelop-list mailing list
> Monodevelop-list at lists.ximian.com
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/monodevelop-list

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ximian.com/pipermail/monodevelop-list/attachments/20131015/22a90b48/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Monodevelop-list mailing list