[MonoDevelop] Unable to run Monodevelop except as root.

Brett Senior brett_senior at yahoo.com.au
Thu May 8 23:41:56 EDT 2008


Paul,
    
    Regarding your reply to my problem as below:


Hi,

On Tue, 2008-04-01 at 02:29 -0700, Brett Senior wrote:
> Given the problem that I had with the installer and the fact that I
> could only run monodevelop via sudo, I downloaded the source for
> monodevelop and built it.  Now when I run monodevelop, either via sudo
> or as myself, I get the following stack trace, which I have included
> below:

Have you tried moving .config/MonoDevelop somewhere else and trying
again?

TTFN

Paul   

    I have installed monodevelop from debian via apt-get and all works fine 
now.  No idea why I have so many problems compiling from source but as 
it works OK when a package from Debian means I'll stick with this method.

 
Thanks,

Brett Senior



----- Original Message ----
From: "monodevelop-list-request at lists.ximian.com" <monodevelop-list-request at lists.ximian.com>
To: monodevelop-list at lists.ximian.com
Sent: Thursday, 8 May, 2008 10:24:00 PM
Subject: Monodevelop-list Digest, Vol 37, Issue 5

Send Monodevelop-list mailing list submissions to
    monodevelop-list at lists.ximian.com

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
    http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/monodevelop-list
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
    monodevelop-list-request at lists.ximian.com

You can reach the person managing the list at
    monodevelop-list-owner at lists.ximian.com

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Monodevelop-list digest..."
Today's Topics:

   1. Re: Progress on a bug report (Lluis Sanchez Gual)
   2. Re: Some minor usability suggestions (L?szl? Monda)
   3. Re: Build monodevelop from source and now cannot    run
      monodevelop - either as root or a non-privileged user. (Paul)
   4. Re: Some minor usability suggestions (Michael Hutchinson)
   5. Re: How to run assemblies with arguments (main args)
      (Artun Subasi)
   6. Re: How to run assemblies with arguments (main args)
      (Martin Dederer)
   7. Re: GTK-2.10 Addin (Lluis Sanchez Gual)
   8. Re: GTK-2.10 Addin (Elmar Haneke)
   9. Re: GTK-2.10 Addin (Lluis Sanchez Gual)
_______________________________________________
Monodevelop-list mailing list
Monodevelop-list at lists.ximian.com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/monodevelop-list

El dl 05 de 05 del 2008 a les 15:16 -0700, en/na David Griffith va
escriure:
> Almost a week ago I posted a bug report for a problem that causes
> corruption of existing projects and mysterious failures in new ones.  This
> is bug number 385712 at https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=385712
> Would someone please take a look at it and try to replicate it.  The only
> response I've gotten on this is an automated post to the bugs list from
> bugzilla.

Thanks for posting the bug. We'll take care of it, but I can't tell
when.

LLuis.




On Tue, 2008-05-06 at 04:09 +0200, Lluis Sanchez Gual wrote:
> El dt 06 de 05 del 2008 a les 01:47 +0200, en/na László Monda va
> escriure:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > * Binding a hotkey to the action "go to the next error" would be very
> > useful.
> 
> That's F4.

You're right.  I've missed that one earlier, sorry.

> > * The incremental search bar shouldn't contain a combobox.  Embedding
> > options within the combobox makes the search functionality obscure, as
> > its mode is not immediately visible.  Also, the "Find Previous" and
> > "Find Next" labels should be replaced with "Previous" and "Next" labels
> > respectively for optimal space usage and it'd be more intuitive to use
> > up and down arrow icons.  My suggestions here are based on Firefox.
> 
> We should follow the GNOME HIG, not Firefox.

I think all of my above suggestions would improve the search interface
and I respect consistency provided by the HIG, but extracting options
from the combobox is clearly an improvement, since currently it's
impossible to see the mode of this interface element and it's very
confusing this way.

I don't know what section of the HIG tells you not to do that, but as
Federico stated earlier, the HIG should act as guidelines, not rules.
http://www.gnome.org/~federico/news-2007-10.html

> > * Line numbers and code seems to blend together when folding is
> > disabled.  Line numbers should have a slightly darker background than
> > the white background of the default theme, this would clearly
> > differentiate line numbers from code and it'd be more pleasing visually.
> > 
> > These are small usability improvements, but I think they are relevant.  
> > 
> > Congratulations for MonoDevelop!  It keeps evolving nicely, it's really
> > a great experience to use a quality IDE on Linux.
> > 
> > Should I report some of these suggestions as (separate?) issues in
> > bugzilla?
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Monodevelop-list mailing list
> > Monodevelop-list at lists.ximian.com
> > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/monodevelop-list
> 
-- 
Laci  <http://monda.hu>

Hi,

On Tue, 2008-04-01 at 02:29 -0700, Brett Senior wrote:
> Given the problem that I had with the installer and the fact that I
> could only run monodevelop via sudo, I downloaded the source for
> monodevelop and built it.  Now when I run monodevelop, either via sudo
> or as myself, I get the following stack trace, which I have included
> below:

Have you tried moving .config/MonoDevelop somewhere else and trying
again?

TTFN

Paul

-- 
Sie können mich aufreizen und wirklich heiß machen!

2008/5/6 László Monda <laci at monda.hu>:
...
>  > > * The incremental search bar shouldn't contain a combobox.  Embedding
>  > > options within the combobox makes the search functionality obscure, as
>  > > its mode is not immediately visible.  Also, the "Find Previous" and
>  > > "Find Next" labels should be replaced with "Previous" and "Next" labels
>  > > respectively for optimal space usage and it'd be more intuitive to use
>  > > up and down arrow icons.  My suggestions here are based on Firefox.
>  >
>  > We should follow the GNOME HIG, not Firefox.
>
>  I think all of my above suggestions would improve the search interface
>  and I respect consistency provided by the HIG, but extracting options
>  from the combobox is clearly an improvement, since currently it's
>  impossible to see the mode of this interface element and it's very
>  confusing this way.

I agree that it would be nice to display contents of the dropdown menu
within the find bar, but we'll run into space problems, even on
1280x1024. There are now three options (one more that last time you
looked, I suspect), and this could well grow (e.g. glob expressions).
Don't forget also that some translations may have longer strings.
Ideally we need a widget that will shunt options into a menu when
there isn't space for them.

Anyhow, the stock Next and Previous icons on my system are left/right.
Maybe we should use icons rather than arrows, but the directions won't
change for most people.

>  I don't know what section of the HIG tells you not to do that, but as
>  Federico stated earlier, the HIG should act as guidelines, not rules.
>  http://www.gnome.org/~federico/news-2007-10.html

Yeah, but Firefox has historically had poor HIG compliance, so isn't
perhaps the best model for many things. However, he FF find bar is
generally pretty nice, EXCEPT that they don't handle the case where
the window is too small :)

>  > > * Line numbers and code seems to blend together when folding is
>  > > disabled.  Line numbers should have a slightly darker background than
>  > > the white background of the default theme, this would clearly
>  > > differentiate line numbers from code and it'd be more pleasing visually.

This looks like a colourscheme issues, since it's fine on the "Oblivion" theme.

>  > > These are small usability improvements, but I think they are relevant.
>  > >
>  > > Congratulations for MonoDevelop!  It keeps evolving nicely, it's really
>  > > a great experience to use a quality IDE on Linux.
>  > >
>  > > Should I report some of these suggestions as (separate?) issues in
>  > > bugzilla?

Yes, please. It helps us keep track of things much better than the
mailing list does.

-- 
Michael Hutchinson
http://mjhutchinson.com

Hello,

My problem is simple. I can't find how to run my assembly with
arguments inside monodevelop. Where can I set the arguments?

At the moment I have to run my assembly outside monodevelop because my
main method doesn't work without arguments.

Regards,
Artun

Hi,

Project Options > Configurations > {Debug,Release} > Output > Parameters

might do the trick. I didn't try it though.

Am Mittwoch, den 07.05.2008, 11:45 +0200 schrieb Artun Subasi:
> Hello,
> 
> My problem is simple. I can't find how to run my assembly with
> arguments inside monodevelop. Where can I set the arguments?
> 
> At the moment I have to run my assembly outside monodevelop because my
> main method doesn't work without arguments.
> 
> Regards,
> Artun
> _______________________________________________
> Monodevelop-list mailing list
> Monodevelop-list at lists.ximian.com
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/monodevelop-list


The new addin for gtk# 2.10 is now available in the following
repository:

http://www.go-mono.com/md/unstable/1.0.0

or if you are running MD from trunk:

http://www.go-mono.com/md/unstable/trunk

I haven't been able to do a real test because I have gtk# 2.10 in my
system, so please tell me if you find any problem.

Lluis.



El dc 02 de 04 del 2008 a les 12:17 +0200, en/na Elmar Haneke va
escriure:
> Is there an GTK-2.10 compilation support Addin available for download?
> 
> What assemblies have to be removed from GAC to compile such a plugin for
> myself?
> 
> Elmar
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Monodevelop-list mailing list
> Monodevelop-list at lists.ximian.com
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/monodevelop-list




Lluis Sanchez Gual schrieb:
> The new addin for gtk# 2.10 is now available in the following
> repository:


I did install it on trunk:

- It does install wotout errors
- References do show version 2.10.0
- There is an problem that "UnhandledExceptionArgs" is undefined

Elmar


El dj 08 de 05 del 2008 a les 09:56 +0200, en/na Elmar Haneke va
escriure:
> 
> Lluis Sanchez Gual schrieb:
> > The new addin for gtk# 2.10 is now available in the following
> > repository:
> 
> 
> I did install it on trunk:
> 
> - It does install wotout errors
> - References do show version 2.10.0
> - There is an problem that "UnhandledExceptionArgs" is undefined

When did you get this error? do you have a stack trace?

> 
> Elmar
> _______________________________________________
> Monodevelop-list mailing list
> Monodevelop-list at lists.ximian.com
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/monodevelop-list


      Get the name you always wanted with the new y7mail email address.
www.yahoo7.com.au/y7mail

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.ximian.com/pipermail/monodevelop-list/attachments/20080508/dd760085/attachment-0001.html 


More information about the Monodevelop-list mailing list