[MonoDevelop] Using version 0.11 on SuSE 10.1
Lluis Sanchez
lluis at ximian.com
Mon May 29 05:34:22 EDT 2006
This is problably not a real issue with remoting, but with the auxiliary
process. In any case, try starting MD with the --ipc-tcp option, so it
will use tcp instead of unix sockets.
El dg 28 de 05 del 2006 a les 18:19 +0200, en/na Contact va escriure:
> Hi,
>
> I have installed MD 0.11 on a fresh install of SuSE 10.1 and I get the
> follwoing error message upon startup:
>
> System.Runtime.Remoting.RemotingException: Unix transport error.
>
> Server stack trace:
> in <0x0008f> Mono.Remoting.Channels.Unix.UnixMessageIO:ReceiveMessageStatus
> (System.IO.Stream networkStream, System.Byte[] buffer)
> in <0x0017c>
> Mono.Remoting.Channels.Unix.UnixClientTransportSink:ProcessMessage (IMessage
> msg, ITransportHeaders requestHeaders, System.IO.Stream requestStream,
> ITransportHeaders responseHeaders, System.IO.Stream responseStream)
> in <0x0024c>
> Mono.Remoting.Channels.Unix.UnixBinaryClientFormatterSink:SyncProcessMessage
> (IMessage msg)
>
> Exception rethrown at [0]:
> ---> System.Runtime.Remoting.RemotingException: Connection closed
> in <0x0006c> Mono.Remoting.Channels.Unix.UnixMessageIO:StreamRead
> (System.IO.Stream networkStream, System.Byte[] buffer, Int32 count)
> in <0x00044> Mono.Remoting.Channels.Unix.UnixMessageIO:ReceiveMessageStatus
> (System.IO.Stream networkStream, System.Byte[] buffer)--- End of inner
> exception stack trace ---
>
> in <0x0008f> Mono.Remoting.Channels.Unix.UnixMessageIO:ReceiveMessageStatus
> (System.IO.Stream networkStream, System.Byte[] buffer)
> in <0x0017c>
> Mono.Remoting.Channels.Unix.UnixClientTransportSink:ProcessMessage (IMessage
> msg, ITransportHeaders requestHeaders, System.IO.Stream requestStream,
> ITransportHeaders responseHeaders, System.IO.Stream responseStream)
> in <0x0024c>
> Mono.Remoting.Channels.Unix.UnixBinaryClientFormatterSink:SyncProcessMessage
> (IMessage msg)
>
> Any idea? I'm wondering why MD needs to call into the Remoting classes upon
> startup.
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
More information about the Monodevelop-list
mailing list