[MonoDevelop] Monodevelop 0.7

Rafael Teixeira monoman at gmail.com
Wed May 18 12:35:32 EDT 2005


Sorry for that. I thought it would not break anything, but surely
althought the source for client code wouldn't need to be changed the
ABI is different.

I'll study reverting it. Any particular guidance here?

On 5/18/05, Lluis Sanchez <lluis at ximian.com> wrote:
> Looks like the problem is that the MD 0.7 RPMs were built with SVN Mono,
> which has a API breaking change in Mono.GetOptions. In r44136 (after
> 1.1.7 release) the RemainingArguments field was converted into a
> property.
> 
> On dc, 2005-05-18 at 17:20 +0200, Federico Noferi wrote:
> > Hi All!
> >
> > I tried to install monodevelop 0.7 with mono 1.1.7 on SuSE 9.3 or NLD
> > but I got the same result:
> >
> > after I install all the RPM packages I try to run monodevelop and I
> > get this error:
> >
> > ** (./MonoDevelop.exe:9741): WARNING **: Missing method
> > get_RemainingArguments in
> > assembly /usr/lib/monodevelop/bin/MonoDevelop.exe, type Options
> >
> > Unhandled Exception: System.NullReferenceException: Object reference
> > not set to an instance of an object
> >
> >
> > Any idea/suggestion?
> >
> > Thank you,
> > Federico
> > _______________________________________________
> > Monodevelop-list mailing list
> > Monodevelop-list at lists.ximian.com
> > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/monodevelop-list
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Monodevelop-list mailing list
> Monodevelop-list at lists.ximian.com
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/monodevelop-list
> 


-- 
Rafael "Monoman" Teixeira
---------------------------------------
I'm trying to become a "Rosh Gadol" before my own eyes. 
See http://www.joelonsoftware.com/items/2004/12/06.html for enlightment.
It hurts!


More information about the Monodevelop-list mailing list