[MonoDevelop] MySql version for mono 1.1.10

[Evgeny Pirogov]

Hello.

For my simple test application with MySql server connection I have next
exception :

MySqlException : Client does not support authentication protocol requested
by server; consider upgrading MySql client.

I have Mysql instaled for localhost. My mysql version is : mysql 4.1.10a-3

Please answer, may be I use old server or this problem for other location?

On 12/9/05, monodevelop-list-request at lists.ximian.com <
monodevelop-list-request at lists.ximian.com> wrote:
>
> Send Monodevelop-list mailing list submissions to
>         monodevelop-list at lists.ximian.com
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>         http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/monodevelop-list
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>         monodevelop-list-request at lists.ximian.com
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>         monodevelop-list-owner at lists.ximian.com
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Monodevelop-list digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. Re: ChangeLog highlighting (C.J. Collier)
>    2. Re: Doc comments (C.J. Collier)
>    3. Re: Contribution solution (C.J. Collier)
>    4. Re: Re: Spanish locale reviewed (C.J. Collier)
>    5. Re: Re: Bug 74617 (C.J. Collier)
>    6. Re: First go at unit tests (C.J. Collier)
>    7. Re: First go at unit tests (C.J. Collier)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2005 22:05:49 -0800
> From: "C.J. Collier" <cjcollier at colliertech.org>
> Subject: Re: [MonoDevelop] ChangeLog highlighting
> To: Jacob Ils? Christensen <jacobilsoe at gmail.com>
> Cc: John Luke <john.luke at gmail.com>,    MonoDevelop-List
>         <monodevelop-list at lists.ximian.com>
> Message-ID: <43991EBD.2020604 at colliertech.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Yeah, I'll try it.  Catch me on IRC for faster response.  I'll just
> patch subversion, re-build and load the ChangeLog file from
> MonoDevelop.  I also made a small patch to gtksourceview-sharp and
> placed your changelog.lang file in the root directory of the
> repository and re-built that before re-building monodevelop.
>
> cjcollier at norseth:~/src/svn/gtksourceview-sharp$  svn diff
> Index: Makefile.am
> ===================================================================
> - --- Makefile.am (revision 54150)
> +++ Makefile.am (working copy)
> @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
> EXTRA_DIST=            nemerle.lang vbnet.lang
> gtksourceview-sharp-2.0.pc.in gtk-sharp.snk
>
> extra_langdir=
> $(gtksourceview_prefix)/share/gtksourceview-1.0/language-specs
> - -extra_lang_DATA=       nemerle.lang vbnet.lang
> +extra_lang_DATA=       nemerle.lang vbnet.lang changelog.lang
>
> pkgconfigdir = $(prefix)/lib/pkgconfig
> pkgconfig_DATA = gtksourceview-sharp-2.0.pc
>
>
> It builds fine and looks good.  However, everything's green.  Would
> you consider changing the color for each section you mentioned below?
> Different color for each would probably be easier to understand.
>
>
> http://colliertech.org/~cjcollier/images/screenshots/MonoDevelop-Changelog-SS.png
>
> Thanks!
>
> C.J.
>
> Jacob Ilsø Christensen wrote:
> > Ok, here is a first attempt. It will highlight the date, email
> > address and file name.
> >
> > Will someone try it out?
> >
> > /Jacob
> >
> > On 12/3/05, *Jacob Ilsø Christensen* <jacobilsoe at gmail.com
> > <mailto:jacobilsoe at gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks. I will give it a go.
> >
> > /Jacob
> >
> >
> > On 12/3/05, *John Luke* < john.luke at gmail.com
> > <mailto:john.luke at gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, 2005-12-03 at 20:24 +0100, Jacob Ilsø Christensen wrote:
> >> Thanks. Still got a few questions (see below).
> >
> >>
> >> Does not seem like it. So if I add a .lang for ChangeLog files
> >> can I just add it to MonoDevelop or will it have to go through
> >> gtksourceview?
> > Probably gtksourceview, we added some before which eventually
> > caused small problems when they were merged upstream and thus were
> > in both places. Maybe not though.
> >
> >>
> >> I added it to monodevelop.xml. Where is that file used?
> >>
> > update-mime-database, which is called when installing to rebuild
> > the known mime types. See
> > http://freedesktop.org/wiki/Standards_2fshared_2dmime_2dinfo_2dspec
> >
> >
> > for the details.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> > Index: monodevelop.xml
> > ===================================================================
> >  --- monodevelop.xml    (revision 53896) +++ monodevelop.xml    (working
> > copy) @@ -108,4 +108,8 @@ <comment xml:lang="en">Webservices
> > Description File</comment> <glob pattern="*.wsdl"/> </mime-type> +
> > <mime-type type="text/x-changelog"> +    <comment
> > xml:lang="en">ChangeLog file</comment> +    <glob
> > pattern="ChangeLog"/> +  </mime-type> </mime-info>
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________ Monodevelop-list
> > mailing list Monodevelop-list at lists.ximian.com
> > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/monodevelop-list
>
>
> - --
> <cjcollier at colliertech.org>
> http://cjcollier.livejournal.com/
> +1 206 226 5809
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iD8DBQFDmR68bS8rWWzCfqgRAscJAJ9YAtovF3V+tjNyY4PCwHTMWZiQSACffI37
> SEBHzm/AUzdlj2s7ZmeOuxs=
> =znRq
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2005 22:30:42 -0800
> From: "C.J. Collier" <cjcollier at colliertech.org>
> Subject: Re: [MonoDevelop] Doc comments
> To: John Luke <john.luke at gmail.com>
> Cc: MonoDevelop-List <monodevelop-list at lists.ximian.com>, Jacob Ils?
>         Christensen <jacobilsoe at gmail.com>
> Message-ID: <43992492.8040506 at colliertech.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> John Luke wrote:
> > Jacob Ilsø Christensen wrote:
> >> Hi.
> >>
> >> I wrote some code with doc comments in MonoDevelop. But the
> >> comments do not show during code completion even though I enabled
> >>  "Generate xml documentation" in the options for the project.
> >>
> >> Is this feature missing in MonoDevelop or did I do something
> >> wrong?
> > Just a missing feature.
> >
>
> So Jacob,  Have you implemented this feature yet?  It's already been
> five days :)
>
> - --
> <cjcollier at colliertech.org>
> http://cjcollier.livejournal.com/
> +1 206 226 5809
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iD8DBQFDmSSSbS8rWWzCfqgRAkbYAJ9cOwfiLPfBaKsqyAVbQxp1yNQbzgCdGwpp
> i58t7Vlo30VtuMx8n8sdQkw=
> =1oyf
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2005 22:48:40 -0800
> From: "C.J. Collier" <cjcollier at colliertech.org>
> Subject: Re: [MonoDevelop] Contribution solution
> To: "Andr?s G. Aragoneses" <knocte at gmail.com>
> Cc: monodevelop-list at lists.ximian.com
> Message-ID: <439928C8.4080502 at colliertech.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Andrés,
>
> This is a wonderful idea.  Please build an .mds and .mdp for the
> codebase and keep it up to date with the autotools.  Since Lluis made
> a console tool that will build a project from .mds/mdp, it should be
> easy to automate the testing of the file after each svn submission.
>
> Please keep us up to date!  I would certainly use such a "Contribution
> Solution."
>
> Cheers,
>
> C.J.
>
> Andrés G. Aragoneses wrote:
> > Hello.
> >
> > I am just wondering some things about MonoDevelop. I see now that,
> > if anybody wants to compile MonoDevelop, he must do it with the
> > command-line. Is it possible to compile MonoDevelop with
> > MonoDevelop itself? If not, why? Because I suppose it is a
> > desirable feature.
> >
> > And I'm thinking that, if this future is available in the future,
> > we could ship an .MDS file along with the MonoDevelop releases
> > which could connect automatically with the SVN repository of
> > MonoDevelop, so as to make easier the contribution to the project
> > (we could call it "the contribution solution" and it could be
> > located in the File menu).
> >
> > Any more thoughts on this?
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Andrew    [ knocte ]
> >
>
>
> - --
> <cjcollier at colliertech.org>
> http://cjcollier.livejournal.com/
> +1 206 226 5809
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iD8DBQFDmSjHbS8rWWzCfqgRAhNUAJwId3Jg34tFK2BHKcKiqo4P4zOwnQCfdkm9
> vPxDD7u5At28XHlNCcmcSrQ=
> =jPQr
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2005 23:01:45 -0800
> From: "C.J. Collier" <cjcollier at colliertech.org>
> Subject: Re: [MonoDevelop] Re: Spanish locale reviewed
> To: "Andr?s G. Aragoneses" <knocte at gmail.com>
> Cc: monodevelop-list at lists.ximian.com
> Message-ID: <43992BD9.6040707 at colliertech.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Andrés G. Aragoneses wrote:
> > Jacob Ilsø Christensen wrote:
> >> Seems like your local repository also points to the old
> >> MonoDevelop location. Try and do a:
> >>
> >> svn co svn://svn.myrealbox.com/source/trunk/monodevelop
> >>
> >> This should give you the right one. It is also described here:
> >>
> >> http://www.monodevelop.com/Download
> >>
> >
> > Thanks for the info. I think I got the old information just by
> > searching "SVN MonoDevelop" in Google. Shouldn't that old
> > repository be dropped just to avoid confusions?
> >
> > BTW, I have updated my sources and updated the "es" locale again.
> > And during the update I have found some problems:
> >
> > 1) The file POTFILES.in contains the entry
> > "../Core/src/MonoDevelop.Core/MonoDevelop.Core/GettextCatalog.cs",
> >  which is incorrect because the real name of the file is
> > "GettextCatalog.cs.in".
> >
> Sounds to me like the .cs file is the one being translated, and the
> .in is the file used to generate the .cs file.  You may know more
> about this than me, but the configure script parses .in files and
> re-writes them without their .in suffix.
>
> If you believe that the .in file should be translated and not the .cs
> file, please make a patch and submit it.
>
> > 2) I think there is a typo in the following string: #:
> > ../Extras/MonoQuery/MonoQuery/Gui/SqlQueryView.cs:222 #:
> > ../Extras/MonoQuery/MonoQuery/Gui/SqlQueryView.cs:259 #:
> > ../Extras/MonoQuery/MonoQuery/Gui/SqlQueryView.cs:469 msgid
> > "Execuing sql query on" msgstr ""
> >
> > Shouldn't it be "Executing" instead of "Execuing"?
> >
> Correct.  Please make this change part of your patch.
>
> > And I have some doubts about the localization:
> >
> > 1) Is a "combine" the same thing as a "solution"? If yes, why we
> > don't use only one of the two words?
> >
> Hmm... I think "Combine" is the Visual Studio.Net name for Solution.
> Yes, we should only use one.  Please make this change in your patch
> and present the question again when you submit it.  If nobody
> comments, it means we agree with you and that your patch should be
> submitted.
>
> > 2) Which is the context of the following string (because I don't
> > know how to translate it)?: #:
> > ../Extras/MonoDevelop.SourceEditor/EditorBindings.glade.h:36 msgid
> > "Smart" msgstr ""
> >
>
> Can't help you here.  Which file did you find that in?
>
> > 3) I think I shouldn't send my "es.po" file yet because it seems
> > that there are some provisional strings, like:
>
> > #: ../Core/src/MonoDevelop.Core.Gui/Base.glade.h:56 msgid "" "You
> > need to restart MonoDevelop\n" "sdfsdf\n" "sdfsf" #:
> > ../Core/src/MonoDevelop.Core.Gui/Base.glade.h:59 msgid "" "aa a a a
> >  a a a a a aa a a a a aaa a a a a a a a a aa a a a a aaa a a a a a
> > a " "a a aa a a a a a"
> >
> > Am I right?
>
> Likely a question that should be directed specifically at Lluis...
>
> >
> > Regards and thanks in advance,
> >
> > Andrew    [ knocte ]
>
> Cheers,
>
> C.J.
>
>
>
> - --
> <cjcollier at colliertech.org>
> http://cjcollier.livejournal.com/
> +1 206 226 5809
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iD8DBQFDmSvYbS8rWWzCfqgRAtbHAJ9YwMRpnyxEIT4N4dkSrd9VFEz2pQCePfIv
> Dao2tofsaCXt6BFr8S1B6GM=
> =ZpsR
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2005 23:02:52 -0800
> From: "C.J. Collier" <cjcollier at colliertech.org>
> Subject: Re: [MonoDevelop] Re: Bug 74617
> To: Jacob Ils? Christensen <jacobilsoe at gmail.com>
> Cc: MonoDevelop-List <monodevelop-list at lists.ximian.com>
> Message-ID: <43992C1C.2020600 at colliertech.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I don't see any problems with doing both...
>
> Jacob Ilsø Christensen wrote:
> > It's a week ago, I asked now. Should I just write my question in
> > bugzilla instead of using this mailing-list?
> >
> > /Jacob
> >
> > On 11/29/05, *Jacob Ilsø Christensen* <jacobilsoe at gmail.com
> > <mailto:jacobilsoe at gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> > Hi.
> >
> > I was wondering what the state is of bug 74617. Should the menu
> > item text reflect the number of selected lines or maybe we should
> > rephrase the text?
> >
> > /Jacob
>
> - --
> <cjcollier at colliertech.org>
> http://cjcollier.livejournal.com/
> +1 206 226 5809
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iD8DBQFDmSwcbS8rWWzCfqgRAvuiAJ9Vldk3wAVMTGVTzBcO3W7mi2CrTwCbBL9W
> v8eNfFiPvBFmiP+7fnGOM3A=
> =3d2O
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2005 23:11:17 -0800
> From: "C.J. Collier" <cjcollier at colliertech.org>
> Subject: Re: [MonoDevelop] First go at unit tests
> To: lluis at ximian.com
> Cc: "M. Scott Ford" <vaderpi at scottandlaurie.com>,       MonoDevelop-List
>         <monodevelop-list at lists.ximian.com>, Jacob Ils? Christensen
>         <jacobilsoe at gmail.com>
> Message-ID: <43992E15.9040708 at colliertech.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Lluis Sanchez wrote:
> >> I am not very fond of this approach. First of all I would like to
> >> run by tests as part of the build process. I would not like to
> >> have to start MonoDevelop to be able to run my unit tests.
> >
> > I already said it many times, but here is it again: many of the
> > MonoDevelop classes won't work without a properly initialized
> > MonoDevelop runtime. So you must 'start' MonoDevelop to unit test
> > them. It doesn't mean that you have to do it manually, and I don't
> > see the reason why it could not be part of the build.
> Do note, Jacob, that "starting MonoDevelop" and getting a properly
> initialized MonoDevelop runtime doesn't necessarily mean starting the
> UI.  This can be automated from a build script, and the tester need
> not be presented with any X interface at all.  This also decreases
> glitches introduced by human interaction.
>
> - --
> <cjcollier at colliertech.org>
> http://cjcollier.livejournal.com/
> +1 206 226 5809
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iD8DBQFDmS4VbS8rWWzCfqgRAnRTAJ9q4NFw6cqiXb0QE2PJfhAhvUzDmwCfW7WD
> lgsUtz37roBfFJALUSlSAmc=
> =BwuT
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 7
> Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2005 23:13:18 -0800
> From: "C.J. Collier" <cjcollier at colliertech.org>
> Subject: Re: [MonoDevelop] First go at unit tests
> To: Jacob Ils? Christensen <jacobilsoe at gmail.com>
> Cc: lluis at ximian.com, "M. Scott Ford" <vaderpi at scottandlaurie.com>,
>         MonoDevelop-List <monodevelop-list at lists.ximian.com>
> Message-ID: <43992E8E.9040105 at colliertech.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Jacob Ilsø Christensen wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > But the main reason is that it won't help in building up a test
> > framework for Monodevelop. Your test would only be testing a
> > particular implementation of the search engine, not the
> > *MonoDevelop* search engine. If that is what you want to do, ok,
> > but I don't think it is the correct path.
> >
> >
> > That is actually what I wanted to do. Test a particular
> > implementation with a unit test. And we then know that
> > *MonoDevelop* search works if all the particular implementations
> > are tested individually.
> >
> > If we next month decide to drop the GtkSourceView based editor and
> > implement our own manged editor, all those tests will be useless,
> > and we'll have nothing to ensure that the new editor does the
> > search in the same way as the old did, and that there are not
> > regressions.
> >
> >
> > It is true that they will be useless but that argument goes for all
> >  code that is thrown away. But as long as we use the GtkSourceView
> > based editor they will not be useless.
> >
> It sounds like these unit tests should go into the gtksourceview-sharp
> tree and not the MonoDevelop tree.
>
> - --
> <cjcollier at colliertech.org>
> http://cjcollier.livejournal.com/
> +1 206 226 5809
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iD8DBQFDmS6NbS8rWWzCfqgRAh4cAJ9NEgNc1VCZQaE7/rwe5sR06C61qwCfeVWZ
> b2SZBowR9di0bApQuYC0l6o=
> =24ff
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Monodevelop-list mailing list
> Monodevelop-list at lists.ximian.com
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/monodevelop-list
>
>
> End of Monodevelop-list Digest, Vol 8, Issue 16
> ***********************************************
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.ximian.com/pipermail/monodevelop-list/attachments/20051209/fe3e2add/attachment-0001.html