[MonoDevelop] Request for Mission Statement

[William Wise]

I'd agree with this.  It's important to have users on all platforms be
able to develop using the same tool.  I would think it should run on
.NET as well as Mono, and ultimately support GTK#, WinForms, and SWT#
development if the latter pans out.

Authors who write books about .NET could do this with a Mono focus and
bundle everything including the IDE with the package.  They can then
take their skills to Linux whenever they desire.

Will

On Sat, 2004-01-10 at 12:58, Jonathan Darrer wrote:
> >From: jasper <jas_lists@gmx.net>
> >Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 20:12:29 +0100
> >
> >Miguel de Icaza wrote:
> >
> >>	* Today the IDE is a simple IDE and on Unix does not do GUI 	  design 
> >>(that is limited to SharpDevelop), but we want to add
> >>	  a GUI designer, and I know Ximian wants to have someone doing
> >>	  this.
> >>
> >>	  Before MonoDevelop, we were thinking `standalone', but now
> >>	  it makes sense to integrate.
> >>
> >>
> >Are you considering porting Glade to c# or will it be more like the forms 
> >designer in SharpDevelop and Visual studio.net?
> >
> >
> >Jasper
> 
> Along side this question is: Will the IDE support S.W.F design? Todd, you 
> were suggesting that MonoDevelop would be targeted at "Everyone who might 
> need an IDE." With respect to GUI design, is that simply within a Gtk# 
> context? Are Windows designers potential end-users?
> 
> Jonathan
> 
> >_______________________________________________
> >Monodevelop-list mailing list
> >Monodevelop-list@lists.ximian.com
> >http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/monodevelop-list
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> Find high-speed net deals  comparison-shop your local providers here. 
> https://broadband.msn.com
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Monodevelop-list mailing list
> Monodevelop-list@lists.ximian.com
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/monodevelop-list