[Mono-winforms-list] Progess Not Known on Some Classes?
Peter Dennis Bartok
Thu, 10 Mar 2005 00:43:05 -0700
I forgot to mention, when logging bugs, make sure you test against SVN head
first, in case you installed from a package. It might have been fixed since
the package was released...
From: "Peter Dennis Bartok" <email@example.com>
To: "Eric Sowell" <firstname.lastname@example.org>;
Date: 10 March, 2005 00:36
Subject: Re: [Mono-winforms-list] Progess Not Known on Some Classes?
>You can log bugs for MessageBox. The 'owners' list does not claim
>completeness, it only lists derivatives of Control, not every class. If
>you're curious about who wrote a particular class, you can always peek in
>the header of the file, it usually lists who worked on it.
>Anything not specifically listed on the owners page is taken care of by the
>core team until it's either complete or a volunteer has mercy with it.
>Specific completeness levels for *every* class in MWF can be checked here:
>(MessageBox has a TODO list in it's header, too, might list as missing what
>you are having problems with)
>From: "Eric Sowell" <email@example.com>
>Date: 09 March, 2005 23:18
>Subject: [Mono-winforms-list] Progess Not Known on Some Classes?
>>Question. Taking a look at the following page
>>(http://svn.myrealbox.com/mwf/owners.html) shows us the progress that is
>>being made toward various controls and dialogs in winforms. If someone
>>finds a bug, for example, on something that isn't on the list, do we
>>send a note to the mailing list or hit bugzilla? And how can we contact
>>the owner? For example, the MessageBox, which seems to be mostly
>>complete, isn't on that list. What if someone were having troubles with
>>Mono-winforms-list maillist - Monofirstname.lastname@example.org
>Mono-winforms-list maillist - Monoemail@example.com