[Mono-winforms-list] Re: win32 api dlls
Thu, 24 Apr 2003 08:39:43 -0700 (PDT)
--- Roderick Colenbrander <email@example.com> wrote:
> I would really subscribe to the wine-devel list were most wine discussions
> take place. Some more projects want to use wine stuff without turning their
> apps into winelib apps.
That would be the best place to go.
> The wine project hardly knows what is going on here. Only a few know (Mike
> Hearn, Steven Edwards and perhaps some more).
> Maintaining this "small" fork will be a pain. Under the hood wine already
> contains some new important changes and because of those your work can be
> redone. The latest distributions (rh9, mdk9.1 and others) use glibc 2.3x combined
> with nptl. All this new stuff breaks wine and the latest wine version is
> needed for it. (needs to be compiled using --with-nptl). So the patches already
> need an update and there needs to come a way to compile with or without nptl.
Forking the Winehq tree is going to be a PITA untill they tag 0.9 They are trying to lock down
tools and options for a 0.9 and a 1.0 release but you still may have some major problems forking
until then. I know this as I have done it for a while with the ReactOS fork of the wine programs
tools and libs. If you have to fork your code because Alexandre wont take your patches then
someone needs to do a proper CVS-branch and sync it with CVSup or something like that.
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo