[Mono-vb] Few more test cases

[A Rafael D Teixeira]

>From: "B Anirban" <banirban@novell.com>
>
>Hi Eric,
>Even I also thought of this scenario.
>And this is the first thing came to my mind.
>But, I am still in lookout for a better way to check this scenario.
>May be we can alter the make file a little bit which will open all the
>positive test files put a Option explicit statement on top and then
>after compilation omit that. This will reduce the effort significantly.
>Any one has a better suggestion are welcome.
>Thanks.
>Anirban.

Unless some line in the source changes it explicitly, we can change 
explicit/strict via command-line options (see mbas --help or vbc /?)

> >>> Anony Mous <Anon21h@yahoo.co.uk> 25-Jan-04 4:45:07 PM >>>
>Hi All,
>
>Its been a while since I looked at mbas but its great to see work is
>still progressing. I just wanted to suggest that we develop two sets of
>
>test cases for each behaviour we are trying to test. One set is for
>"Option Strict On" and the other should be for "Option Strict Off".
>This is for scenarios like with the character literals test (see
>below)
>where it would compile with "Option Strict Off" but not with "Option
>Strict On".
>
>Cheers,
>Eric.




Rafael Teixeira
Brazilian Polymath
Mono Hacker since 16 Jul 2001
MonoBrasil Founding Member - Membro Fundador do MonoBrasil
English Blog: http://monoblog.blogspot.com/
Brazilian Portuguese Blog: http://monoblog.weblogger.terra.com.br/


>
>----------------------------------------------------------------
>A Rafael D Teixeira wrote:
> > On Fri, 2004-01-23 at 13:57, B Anirban wrote:
> >
> >>Hi Rafael,
> >
> >
> > Hi Anirban,
> >
> >
> >>Today I have added few more test cases under btests.
> >
> >
> > Good,
> >
> >
> >>During check-in I realized that last time The Test.Sources file
>didn't
> >>get checked-in for some reason (my be I missed to add that in cvs).
> >>Anyways, I found that you already placed one in place.
> >>Today I added my Test.Sources file in place.
> >>Please let me know if you have any concern with the file. In that
>case
> >>we can revert back to your file.
> >
> >
> > The Test.Sources is OK; but we have problems with some of the source
> > files, for instance:
> >
> > CharacterLiterals1.vb
> > ---------------------
> >
> > Module CharacterLiterals1
> >     Sub Main()
> >         Dim c As Char
> >         c = "x"
> >
> >         Dim a As String = "X"c
> >         If a <> c Then
> >             Throw New System.Exception("a is not same as c")
> >         End If
> >     End Sub
> > End Module
> >
> > Won't compile I corrected it to
> >
> > Module CharacterLiterals1
> >     Sub Main()
> >         Dim c As Char
> >         c = "x"c
> >         Dim a As String = "X"
> >         If a <> c Then
> >             Throw New System.Exception("a is not same as c")
> >         End If
> >     End Sub
> > End Module
> >
> > Already in CVS.
> >
> >
> >>Looking forward for your comments.
> >
> >
> >>From looking briefly at the results file, I think other sources
>contain
> > such errors, I recommend you to always compile with MS vbc in
>Windows,
> > before committing sources to cvs. If that is not possible,
>double-check
> > your coding with the syntax documentation in MSDN and try to
>understand
> > what mbas is saying about the files, to figure if it is a mbas
>problem
> > or a source problem.
> >
> >
> >>Regards.
> >>Anirban.
> >
> >
> >>From the lookout, we have plenty of work ahead of us...
> >
> > Thanks Anirban,
> >
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Mono-vb mailing list
>Mono-vb@lists.ximian.com
>http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-vb
>_______________________________________________
>Mono-vb mailing list
>Mono-vb@lists.ximian.com
>http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-vb

_________________________________________________________________
MSN Messenger: instale grátis e converse com seus amigos. 
http://messenger.msn.com.br