[Mono-osx] License for CSharpPlugin?

[Susan Mackay]

My code certainly IS based on Damien's code, and I believe this is
acknowledged in the documentation and most of the source files. However, a
quick look over the files/documents I have printed out failed to show any
license information other than 'copyright' statements.

To me, this shows the power of these discussions: it beings together the
best of the knowledgeable people.

Susan


On 7/1/07 02:05, "Andreas Färber" <andreas.faerber at web.de> wrote:

> 
> Am 06.01.2007 um 15:19 schrieb kangaroo:
> 
>> I have two things to say about this;
>> 
>> 1.  It sounds like MIT/X11 is most in line with what you want.  It
>> pretty much says in laymans terms; "Take this and o what you want with
>> it.  You can use it commercially.  You don't have to open-source your
>> stuff.  You cant blame me if it breaks something."
>> 2.  I _STRONGLY_ suggest reading the license you pick fully before
>> commiting to it.  You cannot unhatch an egg.
> 
> You all are forgetting something here...
> 
> If Susan's code is based on Damien's code (which it probably is) then
> it's under GPL anyway. The MIT or whatever license could then only be
> applied to her *spec files.
> 
> Andreas