[Mono-osx] configuring mod_mono for apache

[Pierre Mignolet]

Here is the log. It seems to be a problem of access right... Maybe I =
have to
start with root ?

Processing config directory: /private/etc/httpd/users/*.conf
Processing config file: /private/etc/httpd/users/pierremignolet.conf
Processing config file: /private/etc/httpd/users/xsp_examples.conf
[Tue Apr 26 14:46:19 2005] [error] (13)Permission denied: Failed running
'/Library/Frameworks/Mono.framework/versions/current/bin
/Library/frameworks/Mono.framework/Versions/current/lib/mono/1.0/mod-mono=
-se
rver.exe --filename /tmp/mod_mono_server --applications
/examples:/Library/frameworks/Mono.framework/Versions/current/share/doc/x=
sp/
test --nonstop (null) (null) (null) (null) (null) (null)'. Reason:
Permission denied
[Tue Apr 26 14:46:19 2005] [notice] Apache/1.3.33 (Darwin) =
mod_mono/1.0.8
configured -- resuming normal operations
[Tue Apr 26 14:46:19 2005] [notice] Accept mutex: flock (Default: flock)
[Tue Apr 26 14:46:28 2005] [error] [client 139.165.163.164] File does =
not
exist: /Library/WebServer/Documents/favicon.ico
[Tue Apr 26 14:46:29 2005] [error] (13)Permission denied: Failed running
'/Library/Frameworks/Mono.framework/versions/current/bin
/Library/frameworks/Mono.framework/Versions/current/lib/mono/1.0/mod-mono=
-se
rver.exe --filename /tmp/mod_mono_server --applications
/examples:/Library/frameworks/Mono.framework/Versions/current/share/doc/x=
sp/
test --nonstop (null) (null) (null) (null) (null) (null)'. Reason:
Permission denied



-----Message d'origine-----
De=A0: Andy Satori [mailto:dru@druware.com]=20
Envoy=E9=A0: mardi 26 avril 2005 14:02
=C0=A0: Pierre Mignolet
Cc=A0: mono-osx@lists.ximian.com
Objet=A0: Re: [Mono-osx] configuring mod_mono for apache

If you open up Console.app, and then go to the /var/log/httpd/error.log=20
in the logs list on the left side of the console window, it should show=20
you more detail about the error there.  Paste that here and we should=20
be able to resolve it.

Andy

On Apr 26, 2005, at 6:02 AM, Pierre Mignolet wrote:

> It's not working :-(
>