[Mono-list] open sourcing all of Microsoft .net

[nite]

I've heard second hand from someone high up in dev div that '.net is
looking for a new home', it makes a lot of sense really, I'm just digging ;)
On 6 Sep 2013 18:25, "Mike Christensen-2 [via Mono]" <
ml-node+s1490590n4660808h72 at n4.nabble.com> wrote:

> Ah so it's more of a license issue than "releasing the source" issue.
>  Yea, I seriously doubt that will ever happen.  But who knows..
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 10:19 AM, Andrew Clancy <[hidden email]<http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4660808&i=0>
> > wrote:
>
>> That's not open source, that's readable source, you can't fork it or use
>> it, nor merge it with mono & have an official .net framework for linux etc.
>> My thoughts are, if we did have this there'd be more appetite/scope to
>> implement in .net in corporates and environments where linux and/or java
>> rule. Where I work mono isn't an option as there's no other companies of
>> our size using it to the scale we use java, but if a Microsoft backed .net
>> made it to linux it may be an option (and I'm sure if ms open sourced it
>> mono would do most of the work to merge, ms would just need to stamp
>> approval)
>>  On 6 Sep 2013 18:10, "Mike Christensen" <[hidden email]<http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4660808&i=1>>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I'm pretty sure it already is..
>>>
>>> http://referencesource.microsoft.com/netframework.aspx
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 11:33 PM, nite <[hidden email]<http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4660808&i=2>
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>> Has the case ever been made to Microsoft to open source all of .net?
>>>> It's
>>>> heading that way, now even the asp.net stack is open. Not much to
>>>> lose, as
>>>> it isn't part of their core business, and still not part of their core
>>>> windows stack. Loads to gain, massive kudos from the dev community and
>>>> the
>>>> chance to win back the hoards of devs jaded by Microsoft for various
>>>> reasons.
>>>>
>>>> Has anyone from the mono camp ever tried lobbying them, or aware of any
>>>> efforts? What was the response?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> View this message in context:
>>>> http://mono.1490590.n4.nabble.com/open-sourcing-all-of-Microsoft-net-tp4660784.html
>>>> Sent from the Mono - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Mono-list maillist  -  [hidden email]<http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4660808&i=3>
>>>> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mono-list maillist  -  [hidden email]<http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4660808&i=4>
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
>
>
> ------------------------------
>  If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion
> below:
>
> http://mono.1490590.n4.nabble.com/open-sourcing-all-of-Microsoft-net-tp4660784p4660808.html
>  To unsubscribe from open sourcing all of Microsoft .net, click here<http://mono.1490590.n4.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_code&node=4660784&code=bml0ZUBhY2hyZW4ub3JnfDQ2NjA3ODR8LTE5Mjc2NzkzNjM=>
> .
> NAML<http://mono.1490590.n4.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml>
>




--
View this message in context: http://mono.1490590.n4.nabble.com/open-sourcing-all-of-Microsoft-net-tp4660784p4660809.html
Sent from the Mono - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ximian.com/pipermail/mono-list/attachments/20130906/3b78018c/attachment-0001.html>