[Mono-list] Using mono aot / aot-full compilation: nothing appears to happen?
chrisddail at gmail.com
Mon Nov 7 14:57:29 EST 2011
Robert Jordan wrote:
> On 07.11.2011 19:34, applepi wrote:
>> I'd not seen mkbundle. I'll have to look into that as well.. this is
>> into proprietary code for a customer and I'm not as brushed up on how all
>> the GPL/LGPL restrictions affect that as I should be, so I'll have to dig
>> into that somewhat.
> You should dig into that as soon as possible, because both
> '--aot=full' and 'mkbundle --static' require that you code
> is licensed under the LGPL.
>> What's the difference between --aot=full and mkbundle? --aot=full looked
>> like it should produce a single binary as well..
> Mkbundle does not AOT-compile. It's bundling the runtime together
> with your assemblies and their dependencies into a fat binary.
> --aot=full is an experimental feature.
> Mono-list maillist - Mono-list at .ximian
This may end up being more of a problem than I thought. The customer is set
pretty heavily in getting it to a fully native binary. I may need to
explore other avenues.
View this message in context: http://mono.1490590.n4.nabble.com/Using-mono-aot-aot-full-compilation-nothing-appears-to-happen-tp4010058p4013526.html
Sent from the Mono - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
More information about the Mono-list