[Mono-list] Mono 2.6 for Ubuntu

[Peter Hagen]

Hi

I don't understand the problem, I compiled 2.6.1 and MD 2.2 on Ubuntu 32
and 64 without a problem. No breaking anything. It works like a ...
ehm.. [think of something good yourself].

Cheers

Peter

On Wed, 2010-01-13 at 08:52 -0800, Chorn Sokun wrote:

> In short wait or abandon Debian/Ubuntu and try OpenSuse.
> Long story build it yourself get ready to break Debian/Ubuntu
> stability doable be brave :)
> However at the end of the day you build base on the trunk and what if
> you need to redistribute your app will the end user need to build the
> framework the way we did? I better wait until Ubuntu ship the version
> that easy enough (2.6 with MonoDevelop 2.2) but I will keep an eye on
> the mono dev progress however I stick with .NET for the time being.
> 
> 
> Just a thought !
> 
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Chorn Sokun
> +855 12 222718
> 
> http://chornsokun.wordpress.com
> http://twitter.com/csokun
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 1:41 PM, Robert Jordan <robertj at gmx.net>
> wrote:
> 
>         On 12.01.2010 21:03, James Mansion wrote:
>         > B.R. wrote:
>         >> Universal binaries were provided at one point, in the form
>         of an
>         >> "Universal Linux Installer." These were discontinued around
>         Mono
>         >> 1.9.1, because they didn't work properly on most distros:
>         components
>         >> that were relied on were not ABI-stable, installed binaries
>         would stop
>         >> working because libs would change on the system, libs would
>         be in the
>         >> wrong places without LD_LIBRARY_PATH being set, etc. In
>         short, it was
>         >> one giant cockup for the most part, and was hence
>         discontinued in
>         >> favor of letting distro packagers handle it themselves,
>         seeing as in
>         >> almost every case, they know better.
>         
>         > You have to make the installation effectively
>         self-contained. Everything
>         > you say would apply to Java too - but there's just two files
>         for that -
>         > a .bin and a .rpm.
>         
>         
>         Mono depends upon these libs:
>         
>         libexif.so
>         libexpat.so
>         libfontconfig.so
>         libfreetype.so
>         libglib-2.0.so
>         libgmodule-2.0.so
>         libgthread-2.0.so
>         libjpeg.so
>         libpng12.so
>         libpthread.so
>         libtiff.so
>         libungif.so
>         libz.so
>         
>         You don't really want to redistribute them, do you? If yes,
>         who
>         will take care of patching them if (security) bugs become
>         apparent?
>         
>         How would linux look like if every large app would be
>         distributed like this?
>         
>         Robert 
>         
>         
>         _______________________________________________
>         Mono-list maillist  -  Mono-list at lists.ximian.com
>         http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
>         
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Mono-list maillist  -  Mono-list at lists.ximian.com
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.ximian.com/pipermail/mono-list/attachments/20100113/f7b7630d/attachment.html