[Mono-list] Question on Code Generation

[anton123]

Oh, and I think most of that the code generation is going to be database
backend and UI stuff. :-)


Trober wrote:
> 
>> Can anyone shed some light?
> there's not that much to CodeSmith, why bother vs. building a quick 
> parser/template/generator?
> you're better off getting a simple grammar(s) together with an easy-to-use 
> parser, and just fill in the templates yourself
> you'll own the generators when done, and they don't take up that much
> extra 
> effort vs. what they save
> 
>> I'm anticipating a lot of code-generation heavy work.
> shed some light on what you're trying to build.
> Anything that's ORM, service framework (aspx, asmx, WCF, etc.), and even
> UI 
> parts should be auto-gen'd  :-)
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "anton123" <niniendowarrior at gmail.com>
> To: <mono-list at lists.ximian.com>
> Sent: Monday, April 06, 2009 6:00 PM
> Subject: [Mono-list] Question on Code Generation
> 
> 
>>
>> I'm wondering if there's a Mono substitute/counterpart to CodeSmith (or
>> if
>> Mono does support CodeSmith).  I'm hoping it might since I'm anticipating 
>> a
>> lot of code-generation heavy work.  Can anyone shed some light?
>>
>> Thank you so much!
>> -- 
>> View this message in context: 
>> http://www.nabble.com/Question-on-Code-Generation-tp22919191p22919191.html
>> Sent from the Mono - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Mono-list maillist  -  Mono-list at lists.ximian.com
>> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Mono-list maillist  -  Mono-list at lists.ximian.com
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Question-on-Code-Generation-tp22919191p22920204.html
Sent from the Mono - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.