[Mono-list] mod_mono on RH 9

Wade Berrier wberrier at novell.com
Tue Feb 26 12:52:18 EST 2008


I remember at some point we needed to drop support for running mod_mono
on redhat9.  I can't remember what the exact issue was, but it was
something to do with the version of apache that shipped on rh9.

Wade

On Thu, 2008-02-07 at 18:44 +1000, Bryan Buchanan wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I've got a customer using RH 9 and I wanted to get mod_mono working.
> 
> I used the mono 1.2.1 installer (get same error with 1.2.4). Mono works
> fine. I've compiled Apache 2.2 from source and it too works fine, except
> that when it starts, mod_mono doesn't, probably because of this error:
> 
> /opt/mono-1.2.1/bin/mono: relocation error: /opt/mono-1.2.1/bin/mono:
> symbol epoll_create, version GLIBC_2.3.2 not defined in file libc.so.6
> with link time reference
> 
> Unfortunately, I cannot update the site to a newer version of Linux
> because the customer is using a DBMS product which they'd also need to
> upgrade.
> 
> I have mod_mono working fine on other sites using more recent Linux
> distros (eg. OpenSuse 10.2).
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Bryan
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Mono-list maillist  -  Mono-list at lists.ximian.com
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 194 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.ximian.com/pipermail/mono-list/attachments/20080226/3071c315/attachment.bin 


More information about the Mono-list mailing list