[Mono-list] Mono C# versus Java 6 -server performance

[Hubert FONGARNAND]

Yes, everibody knows that there's serious problem with performance in
mono... (see https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=342190)
but Miguel has said that fixing performance problem is a long-term
project... (they prefer focusing on more funny thing...)

Hubert



Le jeudi 29 novembre 2007 à 10:34 +0000, Robert Hulme a écrit :

> Hi,
> 
> I have recently been part of a discussion with colleagues about the 
> merits of C# versus Java. I am of the opinion that C# is a superior 
> language, but my colleagues questioned whether the performance is 
> comparable on Linux (which is what we use here at EBI).
> 
> I had a look on the Language Shootout, comparing Mono 1.2.5 with Java 6 
> -server. 
> http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/gp4/benchmark.php?test=all&lang=csharp
> 
> In almost all the benchmarks Mono C# was significantly slower than Java 6.
> 
> I downloaded some of the benchmarks to see if I could reproduce the 
> results on my machine (Mono JIT compiler version 1.2.3.1 / Java 6). The 
> results were the same. Twiddling with mono / mcs flags didn't seem to 
> make a difference.
> 
> I was wondering if anyone had any insights in to why this is, whether it 
> is a CIL/C# issue or is specific to the Mono implementation, and whether 
> there are any plans to bring Mono performance in line with Java performance.
> 
> Many thanks,
> Robert Hulme
> 

_________________________________________________
Ce message et les éventuels documents joints peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles.
Au cas où il ne vous serait pas destiné, nous vous remercions de bien vouloir le supprimer et en aviser immédiatement l'expéditeur. Toute utilisation de ce message non conforme à sa destination, toute diffusion ou publication, totale ou partielle et quel qu'en soit le moyen est formellement interdite.
Les communications sur internet n'étant pas sécurisées, l'intégrité de ce message n'est pas assurée et la société émettrice ne peut être tenue pour responsable de son contenu.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.ximian.com/pipermail/mono-list/attachments/20071130/e202e39b/attachment-0001.html