[Mono-list] List.FindAll method implementation

[Juan C. Olivares]

I'll check...

Juan Cristóbal Olivares
www.juancri.com

On 3/18/07, Miguel de Icaza <miguel at novell.com> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
>     I feel a bit strange that the bools are allocated using
> numbers.Count but the loop uses this._items.   I rather keep them in
> parallel.
>
>     Also, another idea might be to use three code paths depending on the
> number of items:
>
>         * [0,N] use bools.
>         * [N,M] use bitbools.
>         * [M,infinity] use the old method.
>
>     Thread stacks could not be very large, and you would like to avoid a
> crash in that condition.   Actually, I wonder if stackalloc returns a
> null if the requested size is larger than the available stack.
>
> Miguel.
>
> > Attached.
> >
> > Juan C. Olivares
> > www.juancri.com
> >
> > On 3/18/07, Miguel de Icaza <miguel at novell.com> wrote:
> >         Hello,
> >
> >         >
> >         > Do you have any comment?. I could send a patch...
> >
> >         These numbers look fantastic.   We would love to see a patch.
> >
> >         > best regards
> >         >
> >         > Juan C. Olivares
> >         > www.juancri.com
> >         >
> >         >
> >         >
> >         > _______________________________________________
> >         > Mono-list maillist  -  Mono-list at lists.ximian.com
> >         > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Mono-list maillist  -  Mono-list at lists.ximian.com
> > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.ximian.com/pipermail/mono-list/attachments/20070318/4ec12d53/attachment.html