[Mono-list] SIGQUIT output (locking needed?)

[Miguel de Icaza]

> If that's right, if someone points me to any easy locking primitives to 
> use here I can write a patch (or I could make it so that each thread 
> signals the next to dump its stack, rather than signaling them all at 
> once), otherwise I'll post a bug report on bugzilla.

I think that what we want to do here is suspend all the threads, dump
the stacks and then abort (since running code in signal handlers will
corrupt the program state anyways).

Miguel.