[Mono-list] ASP.NET and Licensing
michael at synthesyssolutions.com
Thu Jul 27 23:19:50 EDT 2006
Alex Nedelcu wrote:
> ASP.NET is quite a controversial piece of the .NET framework.
> ADO.NET is another controversial library, that has no replacement.
> As Thomas Jefferson said ... the price of freedom is eternal vigilance.
> Why can't we just stick with the ECMA standards and create true
> open-source alternatives for the rest of the .NET framework ?
> Is it really that hard ?
Yes. Simply planning and getting a consensus on a framework is very
difficult. Look at PHP. It had no good cohesive framework for a very
long time and now there are dozens of competing ones all at various
stages of completion. Choice is good, but only when there are good
options to choose from.
> I mean, besides licensing reasons, really ... ASP.NET is very
> tool-oriented to be bearable without VS.NET,
> and ADO.NET simply sucks, as I've never seen a more poorly designed
> database access library.
I agree, but remember that Mono will (and has already) attract many
traditionally Microsoft developers. It couldn't do that without a
Also - MonoDevelop is coming along nicely:
> I thought about starting my own database access library, similar to
> Python's or Perl's DBI.
> Shouldn't be too hard to create such interfaces and then to create a
> mysql adapter by wrapping the mysql C library,
> the only problem being the limited free time I have.
I think that everyone here probably has the same problem.
Synthesys Computer Solutions
More information about the Mono-list