[Mono-list] [Mono-dev] quick question about SOAP extension configuration

[L.G. Meredith]

Atsushi,

Thanks for your query. i was under the impression from a previous reply that
it was supported in mono.

Best wishes,

--greg

In response to one of my earlier postings, Robert Jordan wrote:

Hey,

L.G. Meredith wrote:
> i'm in the process of writing a gateway application. It speaks SOAP out of
> one side of it's mouth and a proprietary network application protocol out
> the other.
>
> My application would be much more beautiful and easy to maintain if i had
> the following two bits of interface to .net/mono capability.
>
> 1. i want to trampoline incoming webmethods to invocations to send an
> appropriately formatted message to a tcp stream connected to my app. That
> is, i would like to get the current (web) method and it's arguments. i
> would
> prefer not to copy the incoming arguments to an invocation but to
> generically call an api that will return a data structure providing all
the
> information associated with the method invocation, including method name
> and
> actuals (a.k.a. arguments). i can then pass this data structure to my
> stream
> formatter to format appropriately for the network stream.

Implement a SOAP extension:

http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/cpguide/html/cpconAlteringSOAPMessageUsingSOAPExtensions.asp



On 8/4/06, Atsushi Eno <atsushi at ximian.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Just curious, isn't SOAP extension configuration new functionality
> in .NET 2.0 which we don't support yet?
>
> Atsushi Eno
>
> L.G. Meredith wrote:
> > All,
> >
> > i know this question has been asked a million times, but i can't find an
>
> > answer that works with my setup. Before i try it on mono, i would to
> make
> > sure that the SOAP extension i've implemented works on straight up .net.
> > Everything compiles, there are no complaints about the config file. i
> can
> > invoke web methods and they call the code i in the main body, but no
> SOAP
> > extension code is executed.
> >
> > The SOAP extension code i've got is a simple variation on the trace
> > extension example from the .net libraries. This compiles in with the
> > rest of
> > my webservice. i add the following configuration info to web.config.
> >
> >       <webServices>
> >          <soapExtensionTypes>
> >            <add type="AVSOAPIntercept.AVTraceExtension ,
> >                     App_Code"
> >             priority="1" group="Low" />
> >            <add type="AVSOAPIntercept.AVTrampoline,
> >                     App_Code"
> >             priority="1" group="Low" />
> >          </soapExtensionTypes>
> >        </webServices>
> >
> > i have tried marking the method with
> >
> > [WebMethod(EnableSession=true)]
> > [AVTrampoline]
> > <method signature>
> >
> > and
> >
> > [WebMethod(EnableSession=true)]
> > [AVSOAPIntercept.AVTrampoline]
> > <method signature>
> >
> > i have also confirmed that if i don't put in the qualified name,
> > AVSOAPIntercept.AVTrampoline, in the web.config extension, i get a
> > complaint
> > about the configuration.
> >
> > But, neither of these ever causes exeuction in the implementation of
> > ProcessMessage for AVTrampoline. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
> >
> > Best wishes,
> >
> > --greg
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Mono-devel-list mailing list
> > Mono-devel-list at lists.ximian.com
> > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
>
>


-- 
L.G. Meredith
Partner
Biosimilarity LLC
505 N 72nd St
Seattle, WA 98103

+1 206.650.3740
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.ximian.com/pipermail/mono-list/attachments/20060804/4423e156/attachment-0001.html