[Mono-list] C# 3.0

[Bernhard Herzog]

As I understand it implicitly typed local variables are required for things 
like anonymous types and LINQ to actually work. You cannot say which type an 
anonymous type has. Check out this video, it clarified a lot of things for 
me:
http://channel9.msdn.com/showpost.aspx?postid=114680

Bernhard

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Marcus"
> Most of the features look like solutions in search of a problem, 
> especially
> implicitly typed local variables and object and collection initializers. I
> have used languages that do have these features, and I really do not miss
> them in C#.
>
> Some of the other features like lambda expressions and anonymous types 
> might
> be useful in some cases, but I'm afraid that people will they will be
> over-used by programmers who just cannot resist using these new 
> "features."
> If you give someone a hammer, he will find something that needs hammering.
>
>
> On Wednesday 14 September 2005 4:48 pm, Paul wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> There are some interesting new features being proposed for C# 3.0....If
>> your interested then look at
>>
>> http://msdn.microsoft.com/vcsharp/future/default.aspx
>>
>> (in particular the hands-on-lab .doc file).
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mono-list maillist  -  Mono-list at lists.ximian.com
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list