[Mono-list] Security Madness
Matthew Metnetsky
met@uberstats.com
Wed, 19 Jan 2005 12:52:44 -0500
On Wed, 2005-01-19 at 09:43 -0800, Tom Larsen wrote:
> Instead of working to confuse how the assembly runs, you should work
> towards making the machine that runs it secured.
As the application is distributed, I'm not sure how to secure X client
machines. However, I certainly agree with you if we could. Any ideas?
And yes, all communication from within the assembly is encrypted.
> But if you really want to do this, just use well known public/private key
> technology. Encrypt the assembly, when the app domain is being created
> decrypt it into a temporary file and load that assembly instead.
I'll look into that for now.
Thanks!
~ Matthew