[Mono-list] Stumped - mime type, aspx not being handled , yet ....

[ted leslie]

I am upgrading from about a .3 mono to the latest 1.0.2

Everything has gone well, i updated the httpd.conf to reflect new attributes with mod_mono,
and now when i start everything, 
I get the usual pause, on the first access, as it is compiling the login.aspx and login.aspx.cs
files, and then it offers the aspx file up to me as a file that my browser doesn't know what
to do with, because it never got "handled" and thus, is being delivered to the browser "unhandled".
hat has me baffed, is that in my web.config i have a auth section that will forward all
accessed to the "login.aspx" file, if not auth'd yet,
so i can but in other aspx files, and sure enough, the back end is clearly working because I
can put in  http://........./crap.aspx  and it will deliver me  ........./login.aspx,

this is odd, becuase it appears everything is working, back in mod-mono-server, the mod_mono module,
its taking over the socket in /tmp/mod_mono_server,
its compiling aspx/aspx.cs files I target, YET
it gives me a unhandled page in the end (offered up to my browser).
This seems kinda odd to me, because if the apache is smart enough to know its a aspx
page and went ahead and had mono compile it (first time access since server started),
why would it not also know to deliver it to the browser?
I save the file it offers me, and its just the raw  aspx file, not handled.

I am sure I will kick myself when I find the answer, but I just can't figure it out.


my httpd.conf is set up like the main samples i have seen in docs and list-postings ..

if i try xsp on the same apps, it give me a 
"Redirection limit for this URL exceeded. Unable to load the erquested page. This may be caused by cookies that are blocked." message in the browser.  

Now if i use the /usr/share/doc/xsp/test  apps, then it works

so that would imply that its the web.config file that is the issue (the same one i used in mono .3)
but why would anything in a web.config file have bearing on how apache handles the file ...
not to mention, shouldn't operation of the web.config be the same for .3 verse 1.0.2 ?

i think i will remove auth from web.config and see if that has any change in things.

 
Any thoughts,