[Fwd: Re: [Mono-list] Patch for mcs]
Sat, 30 Oct 2004 16:43:41 +0900
Me too ;-)
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [Mono-list] Patch for mcs
Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2004 16:41:06 +0900
From: Atsushi Eno <firstname.lastname@example.org>
To: Gaurav Vaish <email@example.com>
>>Ugh, so there is a conflict (I used to make the patch too). But sadly
>>to say, maybe am going ahead (it also handles many of the warnings),
>>though I'd prefer the idea having raw string instead of XmlElement.
> Well, there's not a "conflict" per se. This is a separate project
> altogether but I'd like to make it a part of standard mcs, but only
> after I reach to some level.
> Before that, no messing with core-mcs.
> And this "mcsdoc" is going to be fairly advanced -- it can handle
> both the C# way of documentation ("///<xml />") as well as the Java
> way of documentation ("/**"). Well, at least, this is my current idea.
>>The work was suspended since mcs and System.dll build has been
>>breaking for a while (and I don't love mcs /doc at all ;-).
> Well, it finally won't be "mcs /doc" at all. It will only be "mcsdoc" :-D
Ooh, am sorry, I didn't notice about that. Yeah, that tells why the
patch looks on so different purpose.
Well, actually C# XML documentation feature also covers Javadoc-like
syntax. My patch does not cover all of the syntax, but basically do.
Anyways keep up your good work ;-)