[Mono-list] About Mono License

[Manuel Alejandro Ceron Estrada]

Andy Satori wrote:

 > If you contribute code to Mono, you know the license it is under


That's not true. I only know one of the licenses. I don't know the 
proprietary license.

 > if you have the 'GPL only' virus ^H^H^H^H^H religion 
^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H disease ^H^H^H^H^H^H^H issue


I don't have the "GPL only virus". I agree with the X11 MIT License. I 
just have a question about the GPL'ed part of the project.

 > The core elements are dual licensed, but a commercial / proprietary 
license is frequently required by vendors that might like to build upon 
the Mono code and Novell would be foolish to not bend to that where it 
is applicable.
 >

Ok, but Mono does not belong only to Novell, it belongs to a great 
community of contributors too. Then my question is: are all those 
contributors agree with the proprietary license? do they at least know 
the proprietary license?


Manuel