[Mono-list] stupid extensions (dll/exe) question
Francisco T. Martinez
martinf@mfconsulting.com
Thu, 18 Mar 2004 17:51:53 -0600
I hear you!
I remember how confuse I was when trying to find .lib files for static
libraries and learning it was .a!
Then, there was the time I was trying to name batch files *.cmd. Silly
me, expecting them to work in the UNIX shell just because they had the
"right" extension -- at least for OS/2 and Win NT.
Paco
gabor wrote:
>is it needed/recommended to use the standard windows extensions?
>
>i don't really understand the details,but are they used so that it is
>possible to move them to windows and still use them?
>
>i can kind of understand it, but it feels a little
>alien/different/inconvenient to have libs as dll instead of .so and so
>on.
>
>so what's the recommended naming practice when developing mono apps?
>
>gabor
>
>_______________________________________________
>Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@lists.ximian.com
>http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
>
>