[Mono-list] Java, Mono, or C++.. by HP

[Moritz Angermann]

Can't we just wait for Novell/Ximians review on this.
And than take the legal concerns into account? About
what part might get killed off and what might not?

Also speed is relative ( to speed that is ). No, but
honestly we've seem improvements in java's vm over
the years. mono's might as well get improved. I do
not say that the base of gnome should be mono based
at least not yet for the given reasons. But as I
already mentioned elsewhere the *day to day* small
apps could benifit quite well from mono ( with what
ever language you like ).

I do think the potential of mono is huge. And maybe
when gnome 3.6 ( what ever tell me a house number )
ships or the legal review is done, this discussion
should be taken up again.

So lets postpone it until than and during the time
everyone do what he/she likes best / feels comfor-
table with.

kindest regards,
-mo

On Wed, 2004-03-17 at 22:33, Preston Crawford wrote:
> As a Gnome user and fan I'd prefer Gnome remained fast and unencumbered
> by possible legal tangles. I don't want EITHER Java nor Mono to form the
> basis of Gnome.
> 
> Just my personal opinion and I'm a Mono fan as well.
> 
> Preston
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Mono-list maillist  -  Mono-list@lists.ximian.com
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
-- 
----------------  contact info  ----------------
Moritz Angermann       	moritz.angermann@gmx.net
Liquid:Mint            	www.liquidmint.org
Mobile                 	+49 (0) 160 9197 5880
Home                   	+49 (0) 4322 75 12 66