[Mono-list] current SPEC or SRPMs
Dan Berger
dberger@oubliette.org
Sat, 26 Jun 2004 15:37:19 -0700
--=-oHqDEXMjYEwZwp/XeOuz
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=-+zrcWuardl4lY4ld+VTt"
--=-+zrcWuardl4lY4ld+VTt
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I suspect this has been asked before - but I'm wondering if there's any
way we could get updated (current) SPEC and/or SRPM files for the RC1
bits (the ones linked off the "packagers page" are hopelessly
obsolete). =20
I'm running FC2 with the latest available Evolution snaps - which
requires a later version of gtkhml3 than FC2 shipped with - which
conflicts with the binary gtk-sharp packages.
I had a spec file I was using for previous betas, but the whole
provides/requires structure seems to have changed in the RC, and I'm not
keen on trying to work backwards to a working spec file.
=20
Cheers.
--
...Dan Berger [dberger@oubliette.org]
http://www.oubliette.org/~dberger
Inter arma silent leges
A982 E6B1 CB2F 7A49 843A 9297 DA73 4371 1F54 8D0C
In theory there's no difference between theory and practice. In
practice there is.
- Anonymous
--=-+zrcWuardl4lY4ld+VTt
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 TRANSITIONAL//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV=3D"Content-Type" CONTENT=3D"text/html; CHARSET=3DUTF-8">
<META NAME=3D"GENERATOR" CONTENT=3D"GtkHTML/3.1.16">
</HEAD>
<BODY>
I suspect this has been asked before - but I'm wondering if there's any way=
we could get updated (current) SPEC and/or SRPM files for the RC1 bits (th=
e ones linked off the "packagers page" are hopelessly obsolete).&=
nbsp; <BR>
<BR>
I'm running FC2 with the latest available Evolution snaps - which requires =
a later version of gtkhml3 than FC2 shipped with - which conflicts with the=
binary gtk-sharp packages.<BR>
<BR>
I had a spec file I was using for previous betas, but the whole provides/re=
quires structure seems to have changed in the RC, and I'm not keen on tryin=
g to work backwards to a working spec file.<BR>
<BR>
Cheers.<BR>
<BR>
<TABLE CELLSPACING=3D"0" CELLPADDING=3D"0" WIDTH=3D"100%">
<TR>
<TD>
<PRE>
--
...Dan Berger [dberger@oubliette.org]
http://www.oubliette.org/~dberger
Inter arma silent leges
A982 E6B1 CB2F 7A49 843A 9297 DA73 4371 1F54 8D0C
In theory there's no difference between theory and practice. In
practice there is.
- Anonymous
</PRE>
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
</BODY>
</HTML>
--=-+zrcWuardl4lY4ld+VTt--
--=-oHqDEXMjYEwZwp/XeOuz
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: check http://www.oubliette.org/~dberger/pgp.html for recent keys
iD8DBQBA3fqf2nNDcR9UjQwRAgptAJ9hra2b/SOgZlExoFfVApbFGEHq+gCffAUw
yz8GykoI5KOmcAnRz7RWXoM=
=gxjw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-oHqDEXMjYEwZwp/XeOuz--