[Mono-list] Some Crucial Not Implemented VB Items
Wed, 21 Jan 2004 22:56:25 +0100
This thread seems to discuss "redim preserve" pretty good.
In particular this one by Richard A. Lowe (sorry if it's not appropriate =
to copy this here):
Partially true, but I meant "behind the scenes" - that instead of just =
some runtime magic or something else, it just uses ReDim to generate the
copy array IL, and my test program seems to say it does:
this code snipped compiles to the IL below it:
Dim s1 =3D "About to redim"
ReDim Preserve arrInt(10)
s1 =3D "redimmed"
IL_002a: ldstr "About to redim"
IL_0031: castclass [mscorlib]System.Array
IL_0036: ldc.i4.s 11
IL_0038: newarr [mscorlib]System.Int32
IL_003d: call class [mscorlib]System.Array
IL_0042: castclass int32
IL_0048: ldstr "redimmed"
Here it makes a new array and then copies the old array in, exactly as I
would have done in C#.
From: A Rafael D Teixeira [mailto:email@example.com]=20
Sent: 21. januar 2004 21:33
Subject: RE: [Mono-list] Some Crucial Not Implemented VB Items
>From: "JD Conley" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
>There are a few items in VB that are not implemented that, IMHO, would
>make it much more useable. I'm not sure if anyone is really working on
>VB now-a-days, but I would really like to see it improved. VB is the
>most widely used language in the corporate world and a good, free,
>implementation would go a long way. Anyway, here's the items that are
>immediately important for me, but unfortunately I don't have the
>knowledge to dive into the VB class libraries or compiler and implement
>1) Synclock Blocks - System.Threading.Monitor.Enter/Exit is =
>but not the "Synclock Object"/"End Synclock" block. I use this all the
>time and the extra 3 lines of code required to use the Monitor class
>really clutters things up.
Seems to be an easy thing, but never looked at that feature. Please file =
bugzilla for this item, with some testing code, typical of your usage.
>2) IsNothing() Method - The Is keyword is imlpemented so you can do
>"Object Is Nothing" but not this more readable version.
I've implemented in a pair of minutes. Already landed on cvs. But for =
you have to fully qualify it's use, like :
If Information.IsNothing(Expression) Then
>3) Preserve Keyword - It's a pain to have to make temporary copies of
>arrays when you need to change the bounds.
The problem is finding the proper division of labor, between code to be=20
generated where the redim preserve occurs and what a helper class/method =
should do. Besides I'll have to delve in what code compiled with vbc =
that case so that it can work inside our runtime with our version of =
class library. Please, again add a bugzilla case, for us to track the=20
implementation of this feature.
Note: Performance-wise "ReDim Preserve" is a bad thing, because it DOES =
all your array content into a new one. Avoid it for large arrays, or =
that repeatedly change size.
>I'm really impressed with the runtime and class libraries as a whole, I
>just wish VB.NET support was at the same level as C#. I've got a lot =
>large applications written in VB.NET that I'd like to run on Mono, but
>it's just not feasible to port them to C# or work around everything
>that's not implemented.
I must tell you that other issues presently have higher priority, like=20
tweeking the name-resolving logic to expose "VB modules" members as =
(unqualified) names (so that can use IsNothing() unqualified). Also=20
currently most of code-generation works C#-ish (just like if "option =
on" is always set) because we resolve all names at compile-time (no=20
Anyway, if you can't feel like delving inside our code, just =
with it and reporting issues (via bugzilla) will help us a lot.
Thank you for the interest!!!
Mono Hacker since 16 Jul 2001
MonoBrasil Founding Member - Membro Fundador do MonoBrasil
English Blog: http://monoblog.blogspot.com/
Brazilian Portuguese Blog: http://monoblog.weblogger.terra.com.br/
MSN Messenger: instale gr=E1tis e converse com seus amigos.=20
Mono-list maillist - Monoemail@example.com