[Mono-list] Re: [Ikvm-developers] IKVM on Mono on OS/X
Andrew C. Oliver
Thu, 26 Feb 2004 18:39:18 -0500
I don't think IKVM works with mint. So that I guess explains it so far as
this JIT is concerned.
I just bought a linux box so maybe I'll give what I'm trying to do a whirl
there. I want to run JBoss on .NET and see if I can't get certain things
running on there (deployers, AOP stuff so that you could write stuff in C#
and yet get J2EE ala carte services, maybe write services and aspects in C#
eventually, etc). I'm a little cracked I admit, but that=B9s just the sort of
thing that I enjoy ;-)
> From: Erik Dasque <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 15:01:12 -0500
> To: "Andrew C. Oliver" <email@example.com>
> Cc: <firstname.lastname@example.org>, "email@example.com"
> Subject: Re: [Mono-list] Re: [Ikvm-developers] IKVM on Mono on OS/X
> Did you try using mint instead of mono to run this ? 0.30.x on PPC has
> a bug which appears very quickly when you use mono (the JIT) and less
> frequently with the interpreter.
> On Feb 25, 2004, at 2:50 PM, Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
>>>> From: "Andrew C. Oliver" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
>>>> Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 11:12:22 -0500
>>>> To: <email@example.com>,
>>>> Subject: [Ikvm-developers] IKVM on Mono on OS/X
>>>> I know this is a bit on the experimental side but I just grabbed the
>>>> mono 0.30.1 and ikvm. I tried to run Hello.class (the function
>>>> should be
>>>> obvious) and I get a bus error (-v -v -v output attached). I can
>>>> run the
>>>> same code written in C#. Any suggestions, thoughts, comments?
>>>> (Sorry for the cross post but I bet its about equally PPC mono it
>>>> related as
>>>> Andrew C. Oliver
>>>> Custom enhancements and Commercial Implementation for Jakarta POI
>>>> For Java and Excel, Got POI?
>>>> The views expressed in this email are those of the author and are
>>>> definitely not shared by the Apache Software Foundation, its board
>>>> or its
>>>> general membership. In fact they probably most definitively
>>>> disagree with
>>>> everything espoused in the above email.