[Mono-list] MacOS packages.
Wed, 25 Feb 2004 07:22:13 -0700
This is great! Please publish the Xcode projects and scripts you use to
make the package and framework so others can build it from CVS. Miguel or
myself will check them into CVS in case you don't have access.
From: Andy Satori [mailto:email@example.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2004 7:21 AM
To: Urs Muff
Cc: 'Miguel de Icaza'; firstname.lastname@example.org
Subject: Re: [Mono-list] MacOS packages.
Urs is correct, after some more digging, it's the 'way' to go. it's
going to take me a couple of days to cleanup my own system to get all
this built and tested (wish I had another machine for this... oh
I've got the packages and base installer's built, I just need to run
through and tweak them into frameworks. This will also make them much
easier to install and manage in the future.
On Feb 25, 2004, at 8:21 AM, Urs Muff wrote:
> If you actually look at /usr/bin/javac, /usr/bin/java, those are soft
> --> We only have to create soft links for stuff main executables, but
> necessary the .exe assemblies since those are just .Net assemblies
> unless we
> have some .exe Mono launcher in /etc/... as discussed many times on
> As for the version: that is the framework version not the assembly
> The GAC is fine and no problem, but Apple is talking about the
> (mono,mint) dynamic libraries (libmono.dylib, ...) and the C-headers,
> that has a standard folder structure.
> - URS C. MUFF
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Miguel de Icaza [mailto:email@example.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2004 7:43 PM
> To: Urs C Muff
> Cc: Andy Satori; firstname.lastname@example.org
> Subject: Re: [Mono-list] MacOS packages.
>> Well actually I agree that the shell scripts 'mono' and 'mcs' might
>> live in /usr/bin, but I would create a Framework and put it in
>> /System/Library/Frameworks/MonoVM.Framework the same way as
>> /System/Library/Frameworks/JavaVM.Framework is placed (look at the
>> folder structure within the framework to see how Apple is structuring
>> such a beast).
>> But the .Net assemblies should live in
>> where there is a link pointing there @
>> That would conform with Apple's standard much better: I don't know how
>> we would have to build mono to include those in the assembly load
> I think you just build mono with a prefix of:
> And just copy anything that is installed in the bin/ subdirectory to
> As for the versioning: we will be taking care of library versions in a
> different way (the GAC approach)