Tue, 03 Feb 2004 10:20:30 -0800
On Tue, 2004-02-03 at 06:30, Urs Muff wrote:
> On that note: it would be interesting to see:
> - Why did you have to patch it?
> - What are the typical mistakes?
> - What are the patterns for 'porting'/'patching'?
Here are the beginnings of a porting document:
> A suggestion: collect a list on the mono-wiki site.
> - URS C. MUFF
> SOFTWARE ARCHITECT - RESEARCH LAB, QUARK EIF
> QUARK INC.
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> This e-mail transmission and any documents, files, or previous e-mail
> messages appended or attached to it, may contain information that is
> confidential or legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient,
> or a person responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are
> hereby notified that you must not read this transmission and that any
> disclosure, copying, printing, distribution, or use of the information
> contained or attached to this transmission is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you
> have received this transmission in error, please immediately notify the
> sender by telephone +1 (303) 894-3360 or return e-mail message
> firstname.lastname@example.org and delete the original transmission, its attachments, and
> any copies without reading or saving in any manner. Thank you.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: email@example.com
> [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org] On Behalf Of Sergio Blanco
> Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2004 7:29 AM
> To: email@example.com
> Cc: firstname.lastname@example.org
> Subject: [Mono-list] DasBlog
> I have tested DasBlog port and it is fantastic, but I have a question:
> the original DasBlog team will support the patches to make it compatible
> with Mono or this DasBlog port is just for testing?
> Thanks in advance.