Tue, 3 Feb 2004 07:30:22 -0700
On that note: it would be interesting to see:
- Why did you have to patch it?
- What are the typical mistakes?
- What are the patterns for 'porting'/'patching'?
A suggestion: collect a list on the mono-wiki site.
- URS C. MUFF
SOFTWARE ARCHITECT - RESEARCH LAB, QUARK EIF
This e-mail transmission and any documents, files, or previous e-mail
messages appended or attached to it, may contain information that is
confidential or legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient,
or a person responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are
hereby notified that you must not read this transmission and that any
disclosure, copying, printing, distribution, or use of the information
contained or attached to this transmission is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you
have received this transmission in error, please immediately notify the
sender by telephone +1 (303) 894-3360 or return e-mail message
firstname.lastname@example.org and delete the original transmission, its attachments, and
any copies without reading or saving in any manner. Thank you.
[mailto:email@example.com] On Behalf Of Sergio Blanco
Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2004 7:29 AM
Subject: [Mono-list] DasBlog
I have tested DasBlog port and it is fantastic, but I have a question:
the original DasBlog team will support the patches to make it compatible
with Mono or this DasBlog port is just for testing?
Thanks in advance.
Web Personal <> http://www.marblestation.com
Registered LiNUX user #140941 <> http://counter.li.org/
Socio #3274 de HispaLinux <> http://www.hispalinux.es
Miembro de GPL URV <> http://www.gplurv.org
GnuPG key: 0x0ED2CF9D <> hkp://pgp.escomposlinux.org