[Mono-list] Re: Time problems on Mono
Jordi
idroj8@yahoo.com
Mon, 13 Dec 2004 01:48:33 -0800 (PST)
--0-251426671-1102931313=:85827
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> There is a work arround about this:
> http://www.shudo.net/jit/perf/
Yes. I have ported the Java version of Linpack
benchmark to C#.The porting work was reasonably easy
due to similarity between the two
languages.
hi again,
I don't have many benchmarks experience in order to get the results ofthe Shudo's web interpreted, but in my opinion, for the results shownon this web, Mono (JIT) performs well enough while Mono (Interpreter)was not so well...in fact was the slowest, isn't it?.
Sorry for my ignorance but what's the difference between Mono JIT and Mono Interpreter??.
I don't have already any test case that could demostrate the issue thathas started that thread, in which I said C#-Mono is slower thanC#-.Net. The thing is that I must isolate where the time problem isexactly in my code and then try to make a, as simple as possible,sample test that could be then studied properly.
I'll like to comment too one thing that I found strange. It is thatwhen I want to calculate execution times (in milliseconds) over Mono ina WinOS the results appeared as the next example:
WIN MONO profilePut: 409355 ms
Why the WinOS result had no decimal part and have it on LinuxOS?, for example:
LINUX MONO profilePut: 251915,130 ms
Any idea?
bye
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - Find what you need with new enhanced search. Learn more.
--0-251426671-1102931313=:85827
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
<html><blockquote style="border-left: 2px solid rgb(16, 16, 255); padding-left: 5px; margin-left: 5px;"><mauro @n="">> There is a work arround about this: <br> > http://www.shudo.net/jit/perf/<br> <br> Yes. I have ported the Java version of Linpack<br>
benchmark to C#.The porting work was reasonably easy<br> due to similarity between the two<br> languages.<br>
</mauro></blockquote><br>
hi again,<br>
I don't have many benchmarks experience in order to get the results of
the Shudo's web interpreted, but in my opinion, for the results shown
on this web, Mono (JIT) performs well enough while Mono (Interpreter)
was not so well...in fact was the slowest, isn't it?.<br>
Sorry for my ignorance but what's the difference between Mono JIT and Mono Interpreter??.<br>
<br>
I don't have already any test case that could demostrate the issue that
has started that thread, in which I said C#-Mono is slower than
C#-.Net. The thing is that I must isolate where the time problem is
exactly in my code and then try to make a, as simple as possible,
sample test that could be then studied properly. <br>
<br>
I'll like to comment too one thing that I found strange. It is that
when I want to calculate execution times (in milliseconds) over Mono in
a WinOS the results appeared as the next example:<br>
<div style="margin-left: 40px;">WIN MONO profilePut: 409355 ms<br>
</div>
Why the WinOS result had no decimal part and have it on LinuxOS?, for example:<br>
<div style="margin-left: 40px;">LINUX MONO profilePut: 251915,130 ms<br>
</div>
Any idea?<br>
<br>
bye<br>
<div style="margin-left: 40px;">
</div>
</html><p>
<hr size=1>Do you Yahoo!?<br>
Yahoo! Mail - Find what you need with new enhanced search. <a href="http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=29917/*http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250">Learn more.</a>
--0-251426671-1102931313=:85827--